Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />Zoning File #927 <br />July 9, 1985 <br />Page 2 <br />3. Area would require tree removal & grading to create a <br />flat area and would encroach into the lakeshore setback to <br />within about 40 feet of the waters edge. <br />4. Too far from house. <br />Area northwest of the existing house - site suggested by <br />staff for your June 17th review. <br />1. Steep side slopes (aproximately 15-20 foot drop) creates <br />a very difficult construction situation which could start to <br />encroach into the existing tree cover. <br />2. North facing slope and orientation is not desirable for <br />pool use. <br />3. Location does not relate to the house use and traffic <br />patterns. <br />4. Location is visible to train and pedestrian traffic <br />along the railroad which restricts privacy. <br />location based on the following findings and hardships: <br />1. Flat slopes adjacent to the walkout level of the garage <br />2 Close relationship to the house, showers, restroom and <br />s;orage while have a separation from other activity areas of the <br />house. <br />3. Sunny location and orientation. <br />Setback Considerations With Revised Plan <br />Mr. Kopischke notes the pool has been moved 5 feet north away <br />from the lakeshore with an average l«''°"h°re setback of 56 feet. Thi^ <br />new setback also moves the pool out of the DNR 50 foot structure <br />setbacK. <br />Hardcover Considerations With Revised Plan <br />Hardcover has been reduced from 1200 g^t^^ <br />Dlan, the only hardsurface around the pool <br />area is the 85 s.f. of coping around the pool and the 15 deck, <br />other designated hardsurface lies between greenhouse and pool out or <br />the 75' setback area and is needed for maintenance and use purposes. <br />i 1 <br />• k