Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #852 <br />July 9, 1985 <br />Page 4 <br />Staff suggest the following: <br />1. Special fees to cover Orono staff inspection during contruc- <br />tion period. <br />2. Special agreement between owner and City (Developer's Agree­ <br />ment) to have an outside agency hired to make annual inspections <br />per scheduled approval by City. Please note Dr. Hanson has <br />specifically requested the right to enter property for monitoring purposes. ^ <br />Water Quantity <br />1. Design storm return frequency (100 year), <br />this has not been covered in the review.To my knowledge <br />2. Overflow control device - skimmer has been approved by both <br />MCWD, U.S. Soils Office and City Engineer. <br />3. Watershed characteristics - discussed above. <br />4. Retention time - not addressed in applicant's information. <br />Construction Procedure <br />1. Method of Excavation - City to recommend <br />2. Disposal of excavated material - formal pond's material to be <br />used in alterations around pond - wildlife pond spoils of 5*500 <br />cubic yards to be trucked off site. <br />3. Restoration - formal pond area, channel to be completed this <br />summer - erosion control silt fencing, sedimentation control <br />fabrics and hay bales. <br />Wildlife pond - winter months - erosion control to be in place <br />ready for spring growing season. Spring of 86 special erosion <br />control may be required at outlet and surrounding vegetation <br />buffer area. <br />4. Protection of adjacent wetlands - wetlands within railroad <br />right-of-way will be protected by scheduling alteration in winter <br />months and intensified erosion control in spring. Flow from <br />north will never be redirected or inhibited. <br />5. Scheduling — noted above. <br />Purpose of Alteration <br />staff^^^^ also been addressed by applicant and reviewed above by