Laserfiche WebLink
i Mm <br />U <br />#928 Stanley Gregory <br />Page 3 <br />June 12, 1985 <br />4. Is this request so unique that the City need not fear <br />establishing a negative precedent with other hardcover <br />lakeshore setback variance applications? <br />Alternatives of Action: <br />1^ '-enied, the following findings may be considered: <br />1. Early planning decision made by applicant or authorized <br />agents of applicant created the need for the variance. <br />2.Hardships presented by applicant are not valid when <br />dealing with new construction and site planning—good <br />planning could have alleviated all need for variances. <br />3.There are other locations (one to the northwest side of <br />house) for the proposed pool outside of the protected <br />area. <br />4.Variances cannot be granted for the convenience of an <br />applicant but must be based on circumstances unique to <br />the property. <br />If approved, the following hardships or findings may be considered: <br />1* Steep topography and narrowing of lot along western <br />lakeshore. <br />2. Location of existing caretaker's home. <br />J