Laserfiche WebLink
MlNUTF.r. OF Tin: OUONO I'LANN’IHG COMMISSION MFin iNC, HFl.I; ArHJI, 1 , 1‘JO'j rAOF g <br />1908 JON SCllERVEN Toylor suggested using the same conditions as in the heck <br />Resolution 11687 as follows: <br />1. The guest apartment is for use of family memhors only. <br />2. This guest apartment use may not be conveyed to any <br />purchaser of the property. <br />3. .The guest apartment may nc>t be rented out <br />4. This use is subject to City review at the end of four <br />years. <br />Jon Scherven stated that he will need more than four years as <br />his parents plan to retire there. Scherven noted that the <br />house needs upgrading and he proposes to do that. <br />Zoning Administrator Kabusth asked if there was a separate <br />entrance to the guest apartment use. <br />Jon Scherven stated that there is the main entrance to the <br />vestibule and then a door leading downstairs and a door <br />leading to the upper level of the house. <br />Rovegno noted that this would bo like a duplex on a quarter of <br />an acre. Rovengo felt that this was not enough area. <br />Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 10:00 p.m. <br />Taylor move, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of the <br />variance based on the hardship of the location of the <br />existing building and that such approval of variance is <br />subject to removal of an equivalent amount of existing <br />hardcover and the deck may not have concrete underneath the <br />deck if it extends into the 0-7S' setback area and to further <br />recommend that the applicant he required to pay the fee for a <br />conditional use permit subject to the following: <br />1. The guest apartment is for use of family members only. <br />2. This guest apartment use may not bo conveyed to a <br />purchaser of the property. <br />The guest apartment may not be rented out and such to be <br />confirmed by staff yearly. <br />This use is subject to City review at the end of four <br />years. <br />Motion, Ayes ib), Nays (1). Planning Commission member <br />Rovegno voted n'»y. Rovegno felt that the property did not <br />have adequate area to suppoit a second dwelling unit. <br />i