Laserfiche WebLink
MlNU'iT.S or Ti:Ji: OKOKO I’l.AKNlNC. (OMK1T.:'. 1 ON KKKTJ NC; IIKU) AI’HII. ]‘j, I'JH'j I’AOl-: 7 <br />1907 JAMi:S lUGHAM 1.Tot ij 1 h.'i I dfovi'i within t lie ] cikt':,lui e i.etb.ick ari.-o wiil <br />be 3.3% within the 0-7!)' setback area and 3^.7'f. within <br />the 75-250' set liack area. <br />2. Applicant has worked very hard in in.provincj the run off <br />with the terracing of the yard. <br />3. A['plicant has recently installed a septic systen. in <br />Novenibe r, 1984. <br />4. Ftaff draft a resolution to bo filed in the cha in of title <br />noting the septic situation and cautioning a future <br />cwner about the possible septic prof’lems. <br />5. Applicant's proposal is the only place to expand on the <br />Ic't because of the topograpliy of the land. <br />6. Conditions 1, 2 and 5 of previous Resolution #1600 be <br />completed in a timely manner. <br />7. No future variances will bo granted based on the <br />limitations of the property. <br />Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />/♦908 JON SCHERVEN <br />^2649 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />9:25 - 10:00 PM Jon and 7<il Scherven were present. Chairman Callahan <br />announced that now was the time and place for the public <br />hearing concerning Jon Scherven's variance. Assistant <br />Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of <br />mailing and the affidavit of publication. There was no one <br />present from the public for this application. <br />Assistant Zoning /administrator Gaffron noted that the <br />appli cant is proposing to bui Ida two-story addi t ion over the <br />existing concrete slab and deck on the lake side of his <br />parents home. Gafiron noted that in the construction plans <br />a second kitchen is proposed to act as a second dwelling unit <br />that his parents would live in. Gaffron noted that the <br />applicant proposed equal amounts of hardcover tradeoff. <br />Rovogno noted that ho has no problem with the variance <br />because of the trade off factor but that he has a problem with <br />the condit iona 1 use permit because the property does not have <br />adequate area to support a second dwelling unit. <br />Kelley felt that the City could place the same restrictions <br />on Schorven’s application as they did in the Beck's <br />applicatioi.. Kelley felt that the resolution should be <br />filed in the chain of title and require* that the conditional <br />use permit not transfer to a new cwner.