My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-1985 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1985 Planning Packets
>
02-19-1985 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:50:15 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:39:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To; <br />Prom: <br />Date: <br />Subject <br />Pitinning Commission <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />February 12, 1985 <br />#888 Catharing A. Cram, 3760 V.’atertown Road <br />Subdivision <br />Zoning District - RR-IA - 5 acre minimum <br />Area - 80.2 Acres (exclusive of roadways) <br />Application - Subdivision - Metes and bounds - Lot Split <br />Parcel A <br />Total Area = 10.03 acres (exclusive of roadway but <br />inclusive of wet area) <br />Parcel B <br />Total Area « 73.5 acres (exclusive of roadway) <br />Mrs. Cram has applied for a division of her homestead <br />creating one new residential unit of ten acres. The City does <br />not require septic testing for lots in excess of five acres in <br />area. There is approximately 3/4 to 1 acre of wetlands in the <br />northeast corner of the property. The City will as)c for a <br />Flowage & Conservation Easement over that portion of the wetlands <br />located within Parcel A. <br />A 50' wide corridor has been creo'^ed providing access to the <br />new lot via Stubbs Day Road. Note that sections of the Cram <br />property run to the center and at points over the entire <br />designated rights-of-way of Stubbs Bay and Watertown Roads. <br />Since we are dealing with a metes and bounds division, the City <br />will as)< for dedication of roadway via a quit claim deed. <br />The City must address the issue of the two residences on <br />Parcel B. The second residence cannot be designated as a guest <br />house because it is a rental unit and so should be recognized as <br />a non-conforming use and subject to all pertinent ordinances. <br />The second residence shall become a conforming use at the time of <br />a future subdivision of the property. <br />MM
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.