Laserfiche WebLink
HIHUTBS OF TUB PLANNIHG COMMISSION MEETING HELD ADGOST 19, 1985. PAGE 8 <br />1950 ROVBGNO continued <br />Conunission member Goetten stated that she feels that the <br />fence does not meet the intent and standards of Section 10.03 <br />Subdivision 15 (C) and agrees will Sime. <br />Commission member Taylor stated that he agrees with the <br />applicant’s contention that the fence conforms with Section <br />10,03 Subdivision 15 (C), <br />Commission member McDonald stated that she agreed with Sime <br />and Goetten. <br />Chairman Callahan stated he agreed with Sime, Goetten, and <br />McDonald. Callahan stated that he felt Section 10.03 <br />Subdivision 15 (C) was not referring to Rovegno's type of <br />property and didn’t consider his kind of problem. <br />Coi^ission member Sime stated that in addition to Section <br />9.22 permitting a public nuisance, he felt that this fence is <br />endangering the safety of those using the public access under <br />Section 9.21 a public nuisance. <br />Mr. Rovegno stated that the public access at the end of Spates <br />Ave. was a public nuisance, whether his fence is there or not. <br />The ruling of the Planning Commission was 4-1 to deny the <br />appeal and find that staff’s interpretation of the ordinance <br />is correct. Sime, Goetten, McDonald, and Callahan in favor <br />of denial. Taylor against denial. <br />#952 PRANK KOKESH <br />4100 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />APPEAL-INTERPRETATION OP STOCK FARM <br />AND HOME OCCUPATION SECTIONS <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />Neither Mr. Kokesh or his attorney were present for this <br />matter. Because of his absence, it was moved by Callahan, <br />seconded by Goetten, to table this matter until the Sepi ember <br />16th meeting. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Earl and Betty Dorn, 4045 Watertown Road, were present for <br />this matter. Chairman Callahan agreed to hear them but <br />informed them that no action would be taken at this meeting. <br />Mr. Dorn stated that Mr. Kokesh’s operation has been in <br />violation for years and the city has failed to do anythinq <br />about It until now. He feels that residents should receive <br />equal treatment. <br />Chairman Callahan assured Mr. Dorn that if the applicant <br />fails to appear at the next meeting action wi 11 be taken in his absence.