My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1985 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
07-15-1985 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 1:19:54 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 1:18:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 15, 1985. PAGE 16 <br />1940 ANN FISHER 4. The proposed addition will retain a 95* setback <br />from the lake. <br />5. The side setback encroachment of the new addi <br />tion is less severe than the encroachment of the <br />existing house. <br />And subject to the following condition; <br />1. The applicant is put on notice that the present <br />hardcover is 23% and any future plans may have <br />limitations put on them within the 0-75* zone. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained <br />that in most cases where the building exter.tion <br />actually creeps farther away from the lot line, <br />staff handled the application and if all other <br />points were in order the building was permitted <br />without a variance. Technically speaking, there <br />may be some merit to bringing an application such <br />as that in for a variance, an issue the Council <br />will have to address. At this point, when you are <br />8* instead of 10* from the side lot line, should <br />there be a side setback variance requested? In the <br />past the policy has been to allow such an extention <br />on an existing house even if the extention en <br />croaches the setbacks. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that it improves <br />a substandard setback. <br />Fisher noted that an addition to the house is also <br />being planned. The plans have been turned into the <br />building office 1. Could the footings be allowed to <br />go in for the deck before the application goes to <br />Council, for economical reasons? <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that <br />this application could go the July 22nd Council <br />meeting which would speed up the process. <br />Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (0). <br />#941 PAUL R. NUTT <br />2739 SHADYffOOD ROAD <br />VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT <br />PUBLIC HEARING *, • ^ _10:15 - 10;30 PM Paul R. Nutt was not present. Zoning Administrator <br />Mabusth noted the certificate of mailing and <br />atfidavit of publication. The following from the <br />public were present:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.