My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1990 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
05-21-1990 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 9:46:08 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 11:13:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1534-AMUNDSON CONTINUED <br />Hanson stated that if Mr. Amundson would provide a survey <br />showing exactly where the fence is to be located, he may look <br />favorably upon his request. <br />Mr. Amundson said that the survey would cost more than the <br />fencing. <br />Kelley asked Mr. Amundson if it would be possible to reduce <br />the size of the kennel. <br />Mr. Amundson replied that it is necessary to have the kennel <br />large enough so the dog can reach the road. He said that <br />otherwise the dog would not detect anyone trespassing on the <br />property. <br />Kelley polled the Planning Commission for their opinion <br />regarding approval of the kennel. Kelley indicated thar. he is <br />opposed to approving the variance. Johnson, Hanson, Moos and <br />Bellows indicated that they would look upon the request more <br />favorably if a survey were submitted. <br />Johnson stated that Mr. Amundson should be required to <br />submit a survey. He said that it is a requirement and though it <br />may be a financial hardship, it is required of everyone that <br />applies for a variance. <br />Kelley asked Mr. Amundson whether he would like the Planning <br />Commission to table this matter. <br />Mr. Amundson stated that he would have a survey prepared for <br />the Planning Commission to review. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Moos, to table this <br />application until the applicant submits a survey. Motion, <br />Ayes-5, Nays-0, Cohen abstained. .Motion passed. (Cohen departed <br />at this time, 9:50) <br />#1334 REBERS CONSTRUCTION, SUGAR WOODS PLAT <br />RECONSIDERATION OF ALLOWED HARDCOVER WITHIN <br />FRONT/STREET SETBACK AREA <br />Mr. Robert Kost was present for this matter. <br />Mabusth reviewed the information contained in her memo dated <br />May 16, 1990. <br />Kelley stated that he would prefer to have each lot that <br />cannot meet the intent of Resolution #2652, reviewed <br />individually, rather than creating special standards that would <br />only encourage encroachment when not needed.. <br />Mabusth noted that it may be a hardship on a builder if he <br />- 17 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.