My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1990 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
05-21-1990 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 9:46:08 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 11:13:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1S90 <br />ZONING FILE #1529-THIESSE CONTINUED <br />Johnson asked what purpose Outlot A, located northeast of <br />Mr. Thiesse's property, serves. <br />Gaffron explained that Outlot A provides lake access for two <br />Bayside Landing lots and that it cannot be developed. <br />Bellows commented that Outlot A gives visual and realistic <br />relief to Mr. Thiesse's site. She stated that since Outlot A is <br />unbuildable, and that condition runs to the land, it provides a <br />unique condition for approving a variance for Mr. Thiesse. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Moos, to recommend <br />approval of the side setback, street setback, and hardcover <br />variance for construction of an attached 2-car garage as set <br />forth in the application without a turn-around. Gaffron <br />questioned whether the Planning Commission would approve a <br />turn-around apron in the County right-of-way if the County <br />approves. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that <br />they would approve a turnaround in the right-of-way. Motion, <br />Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion oassed. <br />#1534 HOLLAND AMUNDSON <br />3135 CASCO CIRCLE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:43 P.M. TO 9:50 P.M. <br />Mr. Amundson was present. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Gaffron briefly explained Mr. Amundson's proposal, noting <br />that a sketch had been submitted in lieu of a survey. <br />Mr. Amundson showed the Planning Commission photographs of <br />the area where he is proposing to place the dog kennel. <br />Kelley asked Mr. Amundson to explain the hardship for his <br />variance request. <br />Mr. Amundson replied that he needs to place the kennel <br />closer than 30' to the road. <br />Bellows asked Mr. Amundson whether he had investigated the <br />option of using an "invisible fence" which would be an effective <br />and viable alternative. <br />Mr. Amundson stated that the fence will be invisible from <br />the street and will have no impact on the neighbors. He stated <br />that it is important for him to have a dog on the premises <br />because he is away from the property a great deal. <br />- 16 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.