Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1516 <br />April 13, 1990 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />Staff has advised the applicants that easements would not be <br />requested for the wetlands or pond area within the outlots, and <br />that those easements would be requested when future development <br />occurs. <br />The City will require granting of a f lowage and conservation <br />easement over the wetlands in Lot 1, Block 1 abutting Fox Street. <br />Discussion of an easement for the smaller pond within Lot 2, <br />Block 1 will be found in application #1517, the conditional use <br />permit for work in that non-designated pond area. <br />E. Disposition of Existing Structures <br />A number of buildings and structures on the property <br />apparently are intended to be removed as a result of this replat. <br />-ri <br />In proposed Lot 1, Block 1, the existing residence, which <br />will have a new lot line bisectljig^it, is apparently intended for , <br />removal totally. That lot wiH''itlMkl contain a tennis court that 22' <br />is shown to be approximately 12' from the northerly lot line. <br />This is one of the few lot linee^that has previously existed and <br />is not changing, hence Planning Commission could justify not <br />requiring that line to move due to its pre-existing status. <br />Other options would be to require 30' setback for the tennis <br />court, or alternatively Planning Commissicn could request a 50' <br />setback if it is determined that the adjacent lot line is a <br />"rear" lot line. <br />fJt <br />TO <br />> <br />In Lot 2, Block 1, there are two detached garages and a <br />caretaker residence which staff presumes will be removed. <br />Applicants should confirm that this is the case. <br />}S-lO <br />In Lot 3, Block 1, the existing Whitney MacMillan residence <br />has a detached garage structure that will end up being nearer the <br />defined roadway than the existing house. Technically, this <br />garage could be considered as needing a variance, although it <br />exists. <br />Lot 1, Block 2 has no detached accessory structures. There <br />are also no apparent structures on either of the two future <br />development outlots. <br />Applicants should be requested to provide a schedule for <br />removal of the accessory buildings that are to be removed, and <br />such a schedule should be incorporated into the preliminary and <br />final plat approval resolutions.