Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />••• <br />kbptt 16 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />minutes of APRIL 16, <br />«e involved with the ownership of these <br />properties <br />nnfiot A will be achieved. Bellows asked how access to outlet A wixOeAXWWo —- - <br />a“"/iirh!r loV^:t ‘this °t‘r Shflh” ir‘whr'it *een <br />designated as an outlet-naceu e»o —- - <br />^ ,-hai- Lot 1, Block 1, appears to be a <br />huildib?r!St fnrasktd What purpose it will serve. <br />^ • <br />Larry Hanson replied, "?|‘°there‘*’“That‘parcel*was brought <br />rrtrt^e* ;-u'’hdrvniSi;““hec‘rus‘''pitt‘Srt; was nee^ded to enlarge Lot <br />2." <br />Bellows asked why it could not be combined with Lot 2. <br />OeXAUWO - -a. <br />Mr. Taylor explained that there are different <br />involved..VevA. <br />^ I, .Khe ritv Engineer may have good <br />Kelley stated C, it did not make sense,reasons for his alignment of Outlot c.IlO a.wa. -- - - - • ^ i <br />for the Planning Commission s opi Gaffron asxed for tne <br />regarding the cul-de-sac. <br />hhat the cul-de-sac will run by the front of Kelley stated that the cu <br />the Norton house.lOiUUU <br />u a It it would be possible to locate the cul- <br />de-sarii«her**.o*uth where the grade is more flat. <br />u McsfvMillans have a large garden m Baldwin stated that the MacMillans <br />tnat area.area. , ..^ 1 could not be located <br />Mrs. MacMillan asked why the cul-d <br />in Outlot B. <br />Kelley stated that there are steep slopes in that area <br />-- - - - - -— <br />-‘r- -irt‘er4tri^?rdSt‘nf?;?rs!t‘eS!the south may interrere <br />.e-safii'o^ :rMoi‘toi‘s :nf?hrorhrr^if‘L^^^^ <br />iC xroni ------- ----- <br />j Pnaineer*s reconunendation to <br />Bellows interpreted the City Eg <br />- 3 - <br />< 1