Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING , <br />cour. a.d stated that" it <br />is between 15' and 25' from the lot line. <br />B-llows observed that once the house (1620 Fox Street) is <br />removed there will te no principle structure as requrred if the <br />tennis court is to remain. <br />T« T-«»aard to the proposed alignment for Outlot C, Gaffron <br />fsatd "The City Enoineer prefers not to have the Outlot dead en <br />?n the middle of 'someone's lot. However, the proposed outlot <br />Snows logical progression ?Se <br />iron, a topography tU idS^of endfn, the road against a <br />City engineer ^^SeSSloSel lot. The point is well taken <br />SSSr“Lth« “ievelopme'St of Shat _ lot could occur if it is <br />combined with property to the north. <br />Kelley asked Gaffron what the City Engineer is recommending <br />to address the slopes if his alignment is used. <br />Gaffron replied that the City Engineer has not commented <br />about the feasibility of putting the road in that location. <br />Mr Tavlor said, "The MacMillans and the property owners to <br />the rSar "7tS“%Sn%er'ned about upgrading rhe ^road between the <br />rnS«inS;%ny“«r''at ""all Tn that area.’ They would like the <br />gravel road to remain as is. <br />Kelley asked how many houses will exist oh the road when <br />this proposal is completed. <br />Gaffron counted 6 houses that will be served by this road. <br />driveS:i^°“ior^P^ok “lfnSt“"t%‘ "t"h"e ^"en\";an"cV‘of "Ihf <br />subdivision. <br />raffron replied that the entire private road system is <br />within private easements rather than on a platted outlot. <br />« 11 "riven that the proposed subdivision does abuw <br />I think that should be cxarified for the re-ord. <br />Baldwin explained that the use of the <br />being increased by the addition of °"® high degree of <br />MacMillan's have a strong desi^^^ slopes and the limited <br />:i-5ite*se"p'tic systems, we would make a mess of <br />- 2 -