My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1990
>
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 9:25:58 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 9:19:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1581 <br />August 14, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />This house is slightly angled on the lot, such that <br />additions in line with the existing house heading southward tend <br />to get closer to the front lot line. Also, the proposed deck on <br />the street side is a walkway from the main front door to get to <br />the deck as the grade drops. <br />A variance was granted in 1987 for the existing room <br />addition at the south end of the house. Save for the 4' walkway, <br />the proposed decks and gazebo just extend that house further to <br />the south. <br />This residence is at the end of the pa\^ed area of Hanlon <br />Avenue. The proposed deck and gazebo should have a relatively <br />slight impact on the perception of density in the neighborhood. <br />The request for the small lot coverage variance is. of <br />course, related to the size of the lot. To avoid a variance, <br />applicants would have to redesign the proposed deck to eliminate <br />70 s.f. While this might be possible, it might result in a <br />totally revised configuration to still accommodate the gazebo and <br />stairway to the rear. <br />Staff Recommendation - <br />If Planning Commission feels that the proposed front setback <br />variance will not tend to be out of character with the <br />neighborhood, a recommendation for approval could be based on the <br />hardship of the location of the existing house. Note that even <br />decks to the rear of the house would require a front setback <br />variance, because the rear of the house is less than 50' from the <br />street. <br />Likewise, if Planning Commission feels that the proposed <br />deck and gazebo will not have an impact on the visual density of <br />the neighborhood, then a lot coverage setback variance approval <br />recommendation would be in order.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.