04-16-1900 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1512 April 12, 1990 Page 2 of 5 List of Exhibits - Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Application Property Owners List Plat Map Septic Inventory Map Survey Plan of Terraced Garden Topographic Detail Green House Site Plan Elevation of Green House Addition Council Minutes of 2/25/85 Resolution #1712 Review of Application - In a routine building inspection for the new accessory garage structure on the property, the building Ind reported on the extensive terracing done and east yard of the property. The zoning staff contacted M . Ruce to advise of the need for a conditional use permit. In add!tionr applicant advised that the plantings within the teriaced are^a were to be used for his landscape customers. Sections of the retaining wall exceed the allowed height the 50* yard setback area requiring height and setback variance for retaining walls. Please compare Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (L) 10 20 Subdivision 4. This is clear ^ not a typical Ian alteration conditional use emp'o minim or provide gentler sloped areas for -uciiiional applicant is in the business of creating yards with beautiful Gardens Photo reports of Mr. Ruce's gardens have !“lri'nd national landscape magazines. The provide protected/controlled growth areas for young plantings be used in the gardens of applicant's clients. g|-y determine if a conditional use permit is needed for f ® because of the commercial aspect of the use, or is this garden a typical accessory use because of the design and appearance of the terraced gardens? In 1985, the applicant received approval JJsidence. Pleale review Exhibits J J discuss tihe natur© and d©gr©e of coininercial the commercial use was proposed at such a minimal level. Resolution #1712 established conditions for the control of the conunercial use as follows: