Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1520 <br />April Ilf 1990 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Staff Recoamendation - <br />The proposed new garage and driveway would appear to be <br />positive additions to the property- and result in removal of a <br />non-conforming garage. Staff would recommend approval of that <br />new garage and driveway. <br />Regarding the pool. Planning Commission should determine <br />whether the proposed pool and any proposed fence around it will <br />have a significant effect in reducing lake views currently <br />enjoyed by neighboring properties. If not, an average lakeshore <br />setback variance may be justified. <br />The hardcover associated with the proposed pool patio is <br />approximately 2.8%. Planning Commission may wish to consider <br />whether removal of certain items of hardcover in the 0-75 zone <br />might help justify granting the proposed hardcover increase. The <br />only other obvious removals would be further mlnimalization of <br />new sidewalks, or reducing the size of the existing wood deck or <br />proposed pool patio areas. <br />Finally, Planning Commission should determine based on the <br />newly revised lot coverage ordinance, whether the existing wood <br />deck should be counted under the lot coverage criteria. If so, <br />you should determine whether there is justification for a <br />variance to allow 17.5%. If the deck shouldn't be counted, then <br />lot coverage will be 14.8% and a variance is not required. <br />Summary of Issues to Address - <br />1. Hardcover; <br />0-75': remain at 4.4%, or require a decrease? <br />75-250'; allow existing 22.9% to increase to 31%? <br />2. Average lakeshore setback encroachment of 55'. <br />3. Lot coverage interpretation; if required, allow <br />variance for increase to 17.5%?