My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-1990 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1990
>
01-16-1990 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 9:05:55 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 8:57:42 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1470 <br />October 10, 1989 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />3. Proposed Lot 2 is a "flag" lot which would have 60' of <br />frontage on Bayside Road per the proposal. The flag portion <br />of Lot 2 also is covered by the 60' existing road easement, <br />which again was not excluded from the area calculation by <br />the applicant's surveyor. Primary and alternate drainfield <br />sites for Lot 2 would be located along the northerly lot <br />line of Lot 2. <br />4. Lot 3 abuts the Luce Line Trail and was the subject of a <br />prior variance application which was never completed. This <br />subdivision proposal increases the area of that parcel to <br />5.0 acres (including the proposed road easement). One of <br />the issues with that prior variance request was access <br />across the Luce Line Trail, which the applicant could not <br />obtain. The current proposal leaves Lot 3 with no frontage <br />on a public or private outlot road, but gives it about 158' <br />of frontage on a proposed 30* private road easement. <br />5. Outlot A was proposed for possible sale to the abutting <br />property owner at 4360 Bayside Road. However, since septic <br />testing indicates the only alternate site available for Lot <br />1 would be within the area of Outlot A this poses a problem. <br />The proposal does not strictly meet the requirements of the <br />septic code, which requires that drainfield sites be within <br />the building lot which they serve. <br />6. The proposed dividing line between Lots 1 and 2 generally <br />follows a deep ravine. The proposed 30' easement road was <br />located to fit the existing topography. The property <br />contains steep slopes which significantly limit the <br />potential roadway locations. <br />7. A number of variances would be required in order to approve <br />the plat as proposed: <br />A) Lots 1 & 3 would require a variance for lack of frontage <br />on a public roadway. <br />B) Lots 1, 2 & 3 would require lot width variances. At the <br />100' setback from Bayside Road, Lot 2 is only 60' wide where <br />300' in lot width is normally required. Lots 1 & 3 do not <br />front on a public roadway nor a private road outlot, hence <br />they each technically require a 100% variance for defined <br />lot width. <br />C) Section 11.03.24, the definition of "minimum lot area", <br />requires the exclusion of private or public access easements <br />from the calculation of lot area. With this in mind, the <br />actual defined areas of Lots 1 fi 2 are each about 4.0 acres, <br />and that of Lot 3 is 4.95 acres. Each lot would require a <br />lot area variance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.