Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1470 <br />January 10» 1990 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />If the Reiersgord property develops before a future <br />Sr'SrKirTpS <br />Outlot A would be when Lot 1 is divided. <br />The northerly 20' wide proposed outlot segment will serve <br />necessarily subject to an underlying road and utility easement to <br />th. City. Staff would question whether the driveway can be <br />constructed within the 20* corridor provided. If <br />could grant a widened easement to Lot 2, or the outlot could be <br />increased in width. Either way, the fire code stand^ards would <br />require that a 20* driving surface with emergency vehicle tu <br />around be provided for this extremely long driveway length. <br />What part of Outlot A should be paved now? What part should <br />be paved at future development levels? <br />If It is the City's intent to start requiring that private <br />roads be upgraded as old existing subdivisions reach a certain <br />level of development, that would be a positive change in policy, <br />but with many raunifications for homeowners. <br />help pay for it? <br />In the Parten proposal, is this a subdivision that should <br />have a trigger at the 3 unit level, or at the 4 unit level, or at <br />any specified level? Is it the intent of the subdivision code to <br />apply road standards to this mere lot line rearrangement with <br />access outlot creation? <br />III. Should the City request a road and utility easement over <br />all, a portion, or none of Outlot A? <br />gflBspiiiiiip <br />roads for which the City has underlying easements, would have to <br />be available for White's future use if he so desired, with no <br />cost-sharing stipulations.