Laserfiche WebLink
Response: No, not, that I am aware of. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. <br />Response: Correct, the minimal driveway that was originally approved is the direct cause of damage <br />to my property, my neighbor�?�?�?¢�?¢â�?�š�?¬�?¢â�?�ž�? <br />¢s property and the wetland area between his dock and the road, which the 75' setback is in place <br />to protect. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />Response: Correct, the granting of this proposed variance will increase the safety of my family, and <br />all of my neighbors. Having to back out, many times the full length of our private road is extremely <br />dangerous. You can not see cars coming down the hill towards the point or the people walking their <br />pets along the road. This is of great concern now but will be even more so as the snow starts to <br />accumulate. Cars coming down the steep hill towards the point will not be able to stop soon enough <br />as cars are back out of my driveway. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. <br />Response: The granting of this variance is necessary to alleviate the great difficulty felt by my family <br />and many of my neighbors. The variance will also fulfill my neighbor's requests to stop parking up and <br />down the road and along the dock wetland area.