Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br />ailing <br />!d the <br />)ry to <br />m the <br />se is <br />kce to <br />ating <br />ected <br />0% is <br />leck & <br />e new <br />red to <br />L01 in <br />feels <br />blems <br />t the <br />'eated <br />hou 1 d <br />em on <br />if the <br />ound, <br />Ethel <br />nt of <br />tween <br />that <br />m the <br />0 30% <br />the <br />,ce of <br />or to <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTE"ER 15 , 1986 <br />#1069 WILLIAMS CONTINUED <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to <br />recommend approval of the hardcover variance of 36.4 % <br />and side setback variance for second story addition <br />based on the following findings: <br />1) Existing hardcover prior to garage construction <br />was 36.4%. <br />2) Additional hardcover necessary for sufficient <br />maneuvering of cars on the lot. <br />3) Second story creating no enf ringement upc,n <br />adjacent property and no objection from adjacent <br />property owner. <br />Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br /># 10 7 0 RI CHARD RI N EHART <br />985 OLD WNG LAKE ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC NG 8:42-8:52 <br />The Affidavit <br />was noted. <br />of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron explained the <br />request for a side setback variance to construct a 24x24 <br />attached masonry garage. Side setback proposed at 0-2' <br />where 301 is normally required. Applicant has already <br />commenced construction of the slab claiming he was <br />unaware of the need for a building permit. He further <br />explained that the survey shows the lot line extremely <br />close to the rear of the existing slab. <br />Hanson stated that he did not feel that Planning <br />Commission could act on this application until a more <br />detailed survey is submitted. <br />Bellows stated that she has very negative feelings <br />toward doing work without permits and stated that she <br />feels there are alternative sites for the garage based <br />on the fact that applicant will no longer be using the <br />existing tuck -under garage as a garage. <br />Richard Rinehart was present for this matter and stated <br />that they have looked at alternative sites and found no <br />better location. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that <br />additional f i 11 wou ld be requires: to re- locate the <br />garage. <br />Mr. Rinehart noted the septic and drainfield sites that <br />affect alternative locations. <br />�A <br />