Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21t 19 <br />86 <br />#1026 HILBILINIC/VOGT continued <br />Planning Commission members thoughts regarding if a <br />9 and/or where it <br />north/south link should be designated g 9 <br />should be located: <br />Taylor -- agrees with applicant, a north/south link <br />between Watertown Rd. and Woodhaven Rd. on the east <br />side of the Hallson estate. <br />McDonald - agrees with applicant, a north/south <br />link between Watertown Rd. and Woodhaven Rd. on the <br />east side of the Hallson estate. <br />Callahan - no connection street, but if a connection <br />street must be designated he would agree with <br />applicants proposal.. <br />Kelley - agrees with applicant, a north/south link <br />between Watertown Rd. and Woodhaven Rd. on the east <br />side of the Hallson estate. <br />Goetten - does not feel there should be north/south <br />link, but if one must be designated she would agree <br />with applicants proposal, <br />g <br />Bellows - accepts staf f's proposal for a north/south <br />link because it is more realistic based on future <br />subdivision . <br />Chairman Kelley recommended that a 30' easement be <br />designated on the west side of Lots 2 & 3 to the point <br />where it meets Lot 1 in addition to a future <br />north/south <br />link on the east lot line of the Hallson estate if when <br />P <br />the property is developed. <br />/ <br />David Will, future owner of Lot 1, stated that he hopes <br />to buya P <br />portion of the property to the south of Lot 1 <br />and does not intend to subdivide and felt it unfair to <br />designate a 30' easement with no future plans to <br />subdivide. <br />Chairman Kelley stated the the Planning Commission must <br />designate a future access based on the Counci l's <br />direction and are a recommending body only, the final <br />decision will be up to the Council. <br />Pertaining to the property involved in this application <br />only (not including the Hallson estateproperty), <br />moved by Kelley, i t was <br />seconded by Callahan, to recommend <br />designation of a 30' easement on the west side of Lots 2 <br />and 3 to the point whpre it meets Lot 1. Mot.ion, Ayes <br />6, Nays 0. Note: A future north/south link would be <br />located outside of this property and further east. <br />