01-03-1977 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�,.. ,..NOW, Abb .1p affrey subdivision nd attached to hardshel l . (If we Yed a plat that was never evade - another neighbor, of periodic changes � , to : icrA f f rey Wing. A reemmt l's and from a (if this is so, r areas near is gratification nronosed gradinge progress on grading* appl icat ion makes location to he a solid 12, deck 1 no variance ri 2nce . This is the Property lore setback require- val was SW) e building pemit for d rm out on previous ested he change pro- ,th pollution of Lake Novewber 18, 19750 Lnces - Requires 7S' :or again made appl i - so . I noticed the jim another applicat iLon * led drainage. had previously r would build.) t 41Utit' ik : page 1 W�! S. Jantsary 197b - Application apivared before Fl=ninp Commission and CrAmei 1 with grade revisions as shown on new topoR and survey. New topoa included two masonry retaining wa 1 I s between properties for directing drainapr ;away from McCaf frey's . 6. Jmll .ary 1 ' , 1976 - Report from Vi 1 lape F-Agineer reccmmendinf! several chans!es in drainage design - incltiding el iminat ing re-taini.rip walls. 7. . wivary 1.2� 1976 - C:otmcil api►roved drainare plan %;object to followinp,: (a) i' l an a l l ch, only normal fill and grading req u i red for house cons t ntc t i on . (h) Natural f i 11. (c) City l:ng i nee r' s approval. (d) Rotain ing wal I lie el iminated and aret1 1 e ft in natural state . Since grading started in the area, we have had nothing but nroA)Ienis . I 've mot with Mr. McCaffrey and various other Staff meiid)eron miny different occasions. ,�e'vc' s trice to explain to him that this would be a prohl em hefween ne i glihors , not us. lie ignored this and kept calling and we kept returninje. Mr. Benson and I finally met with Mr. kicCaffrey anti `lr. l ovick at 9:00 a.m. on October S, 1976. .Also . present were the following - flick Sathre; Cerry Qietrkow, contractor; Gary Gabriel, contractor's engineer anti two of his field men; and the Iandscapina man. New elevation readings were taken and all parties expressed their satisfaction with the proposed grade changes. Both McCaffrey anti Rovick have assured Us they would notify us of this agreement by letter (none received as yet). We spent 3 hours there. Now to add a little frosting to the cake - - .Test recently I was approached by Henry Sk-arp, the neighbor at 1045 West Fenidale. Ile is complaining; about Rovick's east lot line as it now nuts through his house. It does, in effect, remm in a legal 1 o t line through his house as 1cCaffrey torrensed the original property before obtainirif, Council approval on the new subdivision. Skarp's attorney has also paid me a visit in regards to this although I haven't disclosed any of the previo«s information to him. Skarp is complaining because lie was never personally notified of the court torrens ink hearings and never saw them as advertised, so lie Claims lie never had the opportim i t v to object to the innrorwr property tescription. If we approved the suNl i vis ion based on a 4-etcli raf !ier than an on -site survey as requi real , %%e have anl)roved the lot line n fining t hroi i4l,h h is house. I t secilLs 1 w i c a l that lied Coffin j%nde a survvy lie would iinve lot::tted the on,, final irons as Gain, Gabriel, the contractor's surveyor, did locate the on 4iiilal irons at the t kx% lie made the stirl•ey t;iat was submitted for l:ovick's ;ipill i <<it ion. { ! hope wv' rc• not I i:ti)le for any Gam pets, here.) 9 Wit Street Locati • Legal Descrip ftwr: &AM 0 type of Reque Description o r Please drawo I , indicat 2. Locatio 3 . Ad j acen 4. Locatia exist S. Distant and s ft or plat s or the preps= Abstractors a the lend withi as those name Village recon