Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA22-000039 <br />15 Aug 2022 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />determined by the home at 1945 Fagerness Point Road. The proposed deck will improve the <br />setback with an approximate 25 foot encroachment lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />Sec. 78-1279. Placement of buildings and structures on lots. <br />When more than one setback applies to a site, buildings, structures, and facilities must be <br />located to meet all setbacks. Buildings and structures shall be located as follows: <br />(6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer <br />to the Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) than the average distance from the shoreline <br />of existing principal buildings on adjacent lots; This does not apply to patios and other <br />accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, and/or stairways, lifts, <br />landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore <br />setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The <br />average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward <br />protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. <br />a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot <br />or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the <br />setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the principal building on the <br />immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. <br />b. In situations where the average lake shore setback line bisects the principal <br />building located on either adjacent lot, the next most adjacent lake side point of <br />the bisected principal building shall be used for determining the average <br />lakeshore setback. If the line continues to bisect the principal building, the next <br />most lakeside point is to be used until the setback line does not bisect the <br />principal building on an adjacent lot. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br />to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br />Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br />also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, <br />subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />intent of the average lakeshore setback regulation is to preserve views of the lake