My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2022
>
08-08-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2022 3:49:47 PM
Creation date
9/7/2022 3:37:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 25, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden replied the final plat has been withdrawn. She noted the vacation was a separate action from <br />the platting of the properties; therefore that plat is no longer in the process as it has been withdrawn by the <br />Applicant. She clarified that the plat was a separate application not associated with the vacation. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt asked if the Watershed District has commented on this. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden can go back to confirm but believes everyone was notified properly through the process <br />when the vacation application was under review. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt asked what City fund the $100,000 is being deposited into as it said “public improvements” <br />and whether that is street, landscaping, etcetera. <br /> <br />Finance Director Olson replied the $100,000 was deposited into the Park Fund for improvements in parks. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt asked if they know the total area that was to be sold to Mr. Erickson in the vacated lakeshore <br />and cul-de-sac variance he received. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden does not have the exact measurements in front of her noting the resolution was to approve <br />the vacation with those conditions which have been met. She is happy to follow up with the vacation <br />report. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt is trying to understand why there is a resolution for a resolution and noted that is confusing. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden shared it was requested by the Applicant that the resolution be proposed to the City Council <br />to confirm because there were so many conditions associated with the vacation. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt asked if that is normal. <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick replied it is not uncommon with something that has this many conditions, especially <br />when real estate is involved as the County takes care of the vacation. The City vacates the property, sends <br />it to the County, and the County works with the Applicant. <br /> <br />Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to adopt Resolution 7277 confirming all required conditions of <br />Resolution 7211 have been met. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />7. FIRE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT – CMD 1 AND CMD 2 (22-047) <br /> <br />Deputy Chief Ryan Gonsior asked if any Council Members have questions about the item this evening. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh noted this is the purchase of two Chevrolet Tahoes. The motion tonight is to purchase the <br />vehicles, they would be in the City of Orono’s name, the City would be loaning the vehicles to Long Lake <br />Fire, and Long Lake accepts that they have no claim on these vehicles. These would be the conditions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.