Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#LA22-000035 <br /> 18 July 2022 <br /> • Page 3 of 5 <br /> are also required in order to redevelop the property.The ability to develop the property consistent with <br /> other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances <br /> are not granted. <br /> Structural Coverage Variance (Section 78-1403) <br /> The Code states that residential properties between 10,000 square feet and 2.0 acres are limited to 20%of <br /> the property's area for building coverage.The applicant is proposing a 2,518 square foot home,and a 260 <br /> square foot boat house/shed exists on the property.Together,the buildings total 2,778 square feet <br /> (21.6%)structural coverage,which is 207 square feet over the limit. <br /> Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) <br /> The proposed plans provide a hardcover reduction of 170 square feet (1.3%)from existing conditions, <br /> resulting in 30.8% hardcover where 32.1%currently exists.Tier 1 limits hardcover to 25%of the lot area. <br /> Eliminating the overage in structural coverage(207 square feet)would result in a proposed hardcover <br /> level of 29.2%. <br /> Side Setback Variance(Section 78-350&78-1405) <br /> The plans reflect a 4-foot wide deck stair encroaching within the south side lot setback area, 3.3-feet from <br /> the side lot line. In design,the applicant applied the City's nonencroachment provision in 78-1405(3) <br /> which states that"steps, sidewalks, uncovered porches,stoops or similar structures which do not extend <br /> above the height of the ground floor of the principal building" can be situated as close as 2 feet to any lot <br /> line. Although the Code does not specify, Staff interprets and applies this section to those listed features <br /> which provide required egress to the home.The steps off of the rear deck do not meet this standard; a <br /> variance is required. <br /> Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) <br /> In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed <br /> variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, <br /> light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding <br /> area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal <br /> provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties <br /> because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend <br /> approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical <br /> difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br /> systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br /> subd. 2,when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any <br /> use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br /> located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a <br /> two-family dwelling. <br /> According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: <br /> 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.The proposed <br /> lot area and width variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance.The <br /> substandard lot has difficulties in its small size and depth, and proximity to the lake to permit <br /> redevelopment.The variances for structural coverage, hardcover,and side setback are not in <br /> harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance.This criterion is not met. <br /> • <br /> 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The structural coverage and hardcover <br /> variances proposed to develop this nonconforming lot of record are not consistent with the <br />