|
• Date Application Received: 06/22/2022 O
<br /> Date Application Considered as Complete:06/22/2022 87L.0.At
<br /> 60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 08/21/2022 O
<br /> To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members
<br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator 4.
<br /> tie.
<br /> G
<br /> From: Melanie Curtis, Planner I'YIGG `�kESHO��
<br /> Date: 18 July 2022
<br /> Subject: #LA22-000035,Alexander Design Group o/b/o Atrion & Lisa Faiola,
<br /> 2659 Casco Point Road
<br /> Variances/Public Hearing
<br /> Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot width, lot area, side setback, structural
<br /> coverage, and hardcover variances in order to redevelop the property.
<br /> Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial as proposed.
<br /> Background
<br /> The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on a property with substandard
<br /> area and width. Additionally requested are a side yard setback variance for deck stairs, a hardcover
<br /> variance to permit 30.8% hardcover where 25% is permitted and 32.1%currently exists; and a structural
<br /> • coverage variance to permit 21.6% ..9.:"----;:,;-/,'
<br /> hardcover where 20% is the -/.
<br /> w
<br /> maximum allowed.Thef ,. ,.. .� `
<br /> boathouse/shed on the property
<br /> tIs�• �'9''g= s j' mss„
<br /> 0 0 rj
<br /> will be rebuilt in kind. / 1.);.,,,,,,t, / y^ r.-
<br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis y5•\`' vI • ,- ¢.� -,,�;s, •
<br /> 7 . •
<br /> 4454 4w
<br /> Applicant Submittal Information: i d - , t, // • /t�` '' r6 08'4 Vii
<br /> �° u/ma.._.-, / i / o StT FFNC
<br /> The applicant has stated that the (��,�� ., �z-,,/ /�,��j!i",' .�� .vs��_ 'e` -. irks-TALL
<br /> size and width of the property 75 foot �/ / •",// 'r 1, 40100.9 4f, aprovide challenges for development. , setback 1-/ yiki ///� �The nonconforming lot size limits .0.pan.t•, .4. . T, o 9•!� ;..<,.:
<br /> the amount of building footprint „a6 r a'`�' ,b. , •-•ktt Ii• p,Q41V:i°"aw . : "t,.
<br /> and hardcover from that of a Y •
<br /> wroc L "- "ir '' ' -47' d SF4 41-'4' ,,::� %
<br /> conforming sized lot.They have "'°e•i'S6 --...rt•.31. a /. 4'c
<br /> provided supporting documentation `'"T•. ,?'Nos AREA DRAIN RIA4 ag--":- `'` �J a '
<br /> 'I 1regarding Practical Difficulties R °O Of�"` ,'
<br /> attached as Exhibit B, and should be —`,� �,�. .56'.7.9'49:;/:___:--.,1,
<br /> 8 �j0` '
<br /> ,z-aos
<br /> asked for additional testimony . --• V- o •
<br /> regarding the application. II.
<br /> 954 0194, `e3)O0,,
<br /> w
<br /> f'hsn.._
<br /> Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis:
<br /> In this neighborhood, Staff finds practical difficulties inherent to the size and shape of the lot affecting the
<br /> property which justify the variances allowing redevelopment. However,the proposed structural coverage
<br /> • level, hardcover level, and deck stair encroachment into the side setback are not supported by practical
<br /> difficulties. The plans could be modified to further reduce building coverage and hardcover.
<br />
|