My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2022 City Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2022
>
06-27-2022 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 8:35:05 AM
Creation date
7/14/2022 8:34:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 27,2022 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> line to move away from the inlet setback.The Applicant depicts a new location of entrance monuments <br /> (the property currently has monuments that could be maintained)and is requesting a 5 foot setback from <br /> the edge of the wetland where 25 is required and it is within the 75 foot setback from the inlet.The <br /> Applicant states the inlet is the practical difficulty and the existing conditions of the site for variances and <br /> notes they are improving many of the non-conformities. Staff finds the wetland buffer and lakeshore <br /> variance to allow for new entrance monuments is a convenience and not necessary for the property and <br /> does not support that variance. On June 21 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and <br /> Commissioners discussed the entrance monuments and provided feedback but noted the proposed <br /> placements of those monuments did not meet the standards.No comments were made during the public <br /> hearing and the Commission voted 6 to 1 following Staff's recommendation. Staff recommends approval <br /> of the variances associated with new house construction and denial of the variance associated with the <br /> entrance monuments. <br /> The Commissioners discussed the monuments,noting the Applicant is making them quite a bit smaller. <br /> Peter Eskuche, 18318 Minnetonka Blvd,Deephaven,clarified the red monument on screen is to be <br /> removed and the green is proposed.Part of this is safety for the family and the other part is the amount of <br /> distance in the descent from the highway is very tight for trucks to back out. <br /> Johnson moved,Seals seconded,to approve LA22-000028,2605 North Shore Drive,variances as <br /> written,and approving the variance for the new gate noting the other monuments must be <br /> removed.VOTE: Ayes 3,Nays 0,Abstain 1 (Printup). <br /> 8. LA22-000017,JON RESSLER AND FRANK PLACHECKI,3683 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br /> AND 3685 NORTH SHORE DRIVE,LOT WIDTH VARIANCE FOR BOTH <br /> PROPERTIES <br /> Jon Ressler,Applicant,was present. <br /> City Planner Oakden gave a presentation on the item,noting neighboring property owners are looking to <br /> complete an administrative boundary line adjustment.Moving the boundary is a Staff administrative <br /> action as long as no new non-conformities are created or existing non-conformity is not increased. The <br /> request to move this property boundary increases the non-conformity of lot width so a variance is <br /> required. Each property will require lot width variances in order to allow the adjustment.At 3683 North <br /> Shore Drive the lot width will decrease at the 75 foot lakeyard setback from 54 feet to 52 feet and at 3685 <br /> North Shore Drive the lot width will decrease from 92 feet to 82 feet at the Ordinary High Water Level <br /> (OHWL).The new property boundary will maintain the same lot areas overall.The proposed new <br /> property line will improve many non-conformities on both parcels. Building set back, overall hardcover, <br /> and lot width at the OHWL will improve for 3683 and the new property line will be moved off the <br /> existing driveway bringing that driveway setback closer to conformance for 3685.On May 16 the <br /> Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed support for the application noting <br /> improvements for hardcover calculations and building setbacks were important improvements. Staff finds <br /> the lot width variance may be supported by practical difficulty; Council is asked to discuss and provide <br /> direction for Staff to draft a resolution for this item. <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.