Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />July 21, 2021 <br /> <br />Waldron Law Offices, LTD <br />Attn: John B. Waldron VIA EMAIL ONLY <br />1951 Concordia Street john@waldronlaw.com <br />Wayzata, MN 55391-9320 <br /> <br />Re: Hillier Land Use Application for 1245 Arbor Street, PID 10-117-23-31-0105 <br /> <br />Mr. Waldron, <br /> <br />The City has received your letter of July 9 regarding your clients desire for City approval to subdivide the property <br />into two lots. After reviewing your statements and the supporting documents, please accept this letter as the City’s <br />response to your inquiry. Your letter makes three primary arguments to support a second building site on the <br />property: arguments based on the resolution 1798, arguments based on RPUD regulations, and arguments based on <br />the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Resolution. You note that city resolution 1798 included several statements: <br /> <br />1. if the subject property "is granted a variance and declared buildable by this or some future council, a <br />connection charge in the amount equivalent to one 1985-1 sewer unit assessment shall become due and <br />payable upon granting of the variance" <br />2. if subject property "at some future date becomes a buildable site as a result of a change in the zoning <br />regulations a connection charge in the amount equivalent to a 1985-1 sewer unit assessment shall become <br />due and payable upon application for a building permit" and <br />3. "should the zoning regulations change at some future time to allow additional building sites on this <br />property, any additional buildable lots or sites created by such changes will be subject to another full unit <br />assessment charge to be collected at the time a building permit is issued." Emphasis added <br /> <br />The resolution does offer a possibility for a second dwelling unit, if a variance is granted, or if zoning regulations <br />change that would allow additional building sites. Neither of these actions have been approved by the City Council. <br /> <br />RPUD. Of the two ways you offer to interpret minimum area of a RPUD, the Ordinance requires 5 acres, or a <br />finding by the City Council that one of the 4 conditions exists (Sec 78-626 (1) a-d). These 5 acres may not include <br />designated wetlands, floodplain, shoreline district, or rights of way. The regulation is interpreted consistent with <br />your #2 on page 2. The Council has allowed RPUDs less than 5 acres, when at least one of the conditions is found <br />to exist. <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan. The City Council adopted its comprehensive Plan on June 10, 2019 after the Metropolitan <br />Council approved it on May 22, 2019. The adopted version of the comprehensive plan on the city website can be <br />found here. I won’t go into each point because you may have been referring to earlier drafts of the plan when you <br />referenced a plan dated March 2018. The guided land use for the property is low density residential, with a range <br />of 0.5 – 2 units per acre. Two acre minimum lot sizes for the zoning district is consistent with this range. <br />