Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit B) . The easement was specifically directed to the owners <br /> of the Letendre parcel at that time, "and to their heirs and <br /> assigns, as an appurtenance to the premises". This Agreement was <br /> duly memorialized on the certificates of title to both the <br /> Chapman and Letendre parcels and remains a memorial on both <br /> certificates to the present day. <br /> The Petitioners, Robert T. Letendre and Theresa L. Wiebe <br /> purchased the Letendre parcel in May of l985. They immediately <br /> thereafter retained an attorney for the purpose of bringing the <br /> petition referenced in the caption of this suit which sought to <br /> have the legal description to the property amended to specifical- <br /> ly include the lake access parcel. Just prior to a default hear- <br /> ing on said petition , an appearance was made by the City of Orono <br /> which asked for and received permission to submit an answer to <br /> the Petition. The City of Orono filed an Answer requesting that <br /> the Court not issue an order as requested by Petitioner. The <br /> grounds for this answer are allegations that Mr. Chapman, in <br /> connection with the platting of Chapman Addition, promised the <br /> City of Orono that riparian rights would not be granted to the <br /> Letendre parcel. The City of Orono also alleges that "Petition- <br /> ers had actual or constructive notice that the Letendre parcel <br /> was to have no lake access across the Chapman parcel. . ." . <br /> The Petitioners have submitted affidavits from both Peti- <br /> tioners, and from both the listing agent and the selling agent of <br /> the Letendre parcel when they purchased it, denying that there <br /> was any actual knowledge of any contension on the part of the <br /> -2- <br />