Laserfiche WebLink
To: Lisa Berg, Hennepin County Attorney's Office <br /> From: Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br /> Date: December 2, 1999 <br /> Subject: 4300 Watertown Road - James Johnson Property -Brief Analysis of Septic Testing <br /> Summary <br /> The on-site sewage treatment system site evaluation work completed by SP Testing found four <br /> acceptable sites for sewage treatment systems within the area of Lots 1-2-3 Block 1. These four sites <br /> would accommodate 2 single family homes,each home requiring two sites(a primary and an alternate). <br /> SP Testing has suggested a lot line rearrangement that would accommodate two homes on these three <br /> original lots. <br /> Analysis <br /> The testing was completed on the premise that each of these three original lots were individually <br /> buildable prior to the taking for road right-of-way*. It is impossible after-the-fact to know for sure <br /> whether the area taken from each lot contained septic sites, since those areas now have been regraded. <br /> Likewise, it is impossible now to determine for sure whether the area taken up by Johnson's berms <br /> contained septic sites. <br /> What can be determined is where there are septic sites on the remaining,relatively undisturbed portions <br /> of the three lots. The primary criteria for defining whether suitable septic sites exist are: <br /> 1. Must be undisturbed soils (no cutting or filling)(State Code) <br /> 2. Must have at least 12" depth to mottling (indicator of seasonal saturation)(State Code) <br /> 3. Must have slopes less than 6% for mound system (Orono code limitation) <br /> 4. Must have perc rates within specified limits (State Code) <br /> 5. Must have an area large enough to construct a mound system for the size house to be <br /> constructed(Orono Code requires sites be tested to have capability for 5-bedroom homes, <br /> which are typical in this area; this usually means an area for each septic site of about <br /> 50'x100' meeting 20' setbacks from house, lot lines, etc.) <br /> SP Testing's reports show that on Lots 1 and 3 there are substantial areas that would not meet one or <br /> both of the first two criteria. It also then shows that the suitable areas meeting criteria 1, 2 and 3 are <br /> located in the southwesterly portion of Lot 1,over most of Lot 2,and in the northeasterly portion of Lot <br /> 3. The problem this poses is three-fold: a) the septic sites on Lot 3 necessarily overlap into Lot 2; <br /> *The City does not agree with this premise because all three lots plus Lots 1-2 Block 2 and Outlot A were legally <br /> combined prior to issuance of a permit for construction of the home at 4300 Watertown Road,which building permit <br /> relied on the legal combination to create a lot containing at least 5 acres and a street setback of at least 100'. It is the <br /> City's position that the entire property including Lots 1-2-3 Block 1, Lots 1-2 Block 2 and Outlot A, is a single <br /> property for zoning purposes. It is the City's position that the three lots were not individually buildable prior to the <br /> taking. <br />