Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #LA20-000001 <br />February 18, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />consistent with approved concept plan? <br />2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />The final plans as submitted are generally consistent with the previously reviewed resolution <br />documents. The final plans should reflect city and engineer comments included in Exhibits F and <br />G prior to placement on the City Council agenda for final review and approval. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the master development plan subject to those comments. <br /> <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Application <br />Exhibit B. Architectural Plans <br />1. Entrance Roof revision <br />Exhibit C. Civil Plans <br />Exhibit D. Landscape Plan <br />Exhibit E. Resolution 6869 <br />Exhibit F. Comment Letter dated 2-3-20 <br />Exhibit G. Engineering review <br />Exhibit H. Condition Summary <br />Exhibit I. MCWD approval <br />Exhibit J. SAC determination <br />Exhibit K. Mailing information <br /> <br />References <br /> RPUD standards <br /> File 18-000036 (original case file)