My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
03-09-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2022 3:29:35 PM
Creation date
1/12/2022 3:23:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 24, 20 20 <br />6 :00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 13 of 15 <br /> <br />have a minor effect on the overall budget. Ung displayed documents showing the top ten vendors used in <br />the fourth quarter of 2019 and also the top ten vendors used in 2019, indicating these vendors also make <br />up 50 percent of payments during 2019. She noted new investments were added during the fourth quarter <br />of 2019. Rates were rising at the beginning of 2019; in the second half of the year, the Feds cut the rate <br />three times. In the upcoming months it is expected the Feds will cut rates again. Interest received at the <br />end of 2019 totaled $285,000. <br /> <br />Walsh asked how the numbers compared to what was expected. <br /> <br />Olson said they thought they would do a little better since interest rates were rising, but it came in about <br />$15,000 less than last year on basically the same amount of principal. They have not done the mark to <br />market exercise. As interest rates dropped at the end of the year, the City gets a positive bump. <br /> <br />Walsh indicated things are looking good. <br /> <br />Crosby said there would be more money for roads. <br /> <br />Walsh stated all road work can get done and extra money can be put aside for a bigger project such as the <br />public works facility or the park trails. They are starting to have an actual funding mechanism in place for <br />the Park Commission because they are on board for 5-10,000 a year. Now that the parks are up and <br />running, the City needs to keep them that way, so they will probably need 100-150,000 a year in their <br />budget. It would be a good year to start talking about that in addition to bringing the roads up some more. <br />The goal is to have them self-sustaining. The City is in a good place right now. <br /> <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br /> <br />Crosby acknowledged Dwayne Gluh’s 33 years of service on the Long Lake Fire Department. He worked <br />with Dwayne for almost 11 years in the department, and he was outstanding. <br /> <br />Johnson noted he had an unwanted interaction with the fire department and Orono Police Department <br />when his sister was involved in a car accident. He should have thanked the fire department chief; they did <br />a great job. He said he would like to be more in tune with how often the City is having code enforcement <br />issues being sent off for prosecution for non-compliance. He put in a request but has not gotten a reply <br />from anybody. He suggested getting a breakdown of where code enforcement is going. He said it wasn't <br />too long ago when numbers couldn't be pulled so progress is being made in the right direction, but he <br />thinks the process needs to be fine -tuned. Otherwise, the Council doesn't know what the issues are to have <br />a good judgment. <br /> <br />Council members suggested incorporating the code enforcement information in the weekly updates and <br />that if there are any questions, Barnhart could be contacted. <br /> <br />Walsh said he met with a few people that are interested in buying developments and there is a lot of <br />activity going on in the City. He stated several years ago when they brought fees down from $750 to <br />whatever it costs currently, about $235, he was told the City would lose about $30,000 in revenue. His <br />comment was that it would be an incentive for people to have more stuff done. He believes it's happened <br />tenfold over that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.