My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
07-27-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2022 3:03:26 PM
Creation date
1/12/2022 2:56:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 19 <br /> <br />completion of their high school experience. The event gave them a chance to do so. She said there is a <br />possibility of this becoming an annual event. In addition to experiencing the recognition from the parade, <br />she believes the students will carry with them some important lessons learned. She hopes they learned if <br />they do not find their circumstances acceptable, they have the power to change it by being innovative, <br />organizing and creating a different outcome. She thanked Mayor Walsh, Chief Farniok, Sergeant Siltala, <br />City Administrator Rief, Council Members Seals, Printup, Crosby, Johnson, and the Police Department. <br /> <br />Walsh said it was a fun event and important to make it a final moment to remember. He thanked her for <br />her efforts. <br /> <br />Crosby thanked the parents who organized it and said it was wonderful that the parents stepped up and <br />helped facilitate the event. <br /> <br />PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER REPORT <br /> <br />13. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE INSPECTION PROGRAM – ORDINANCE 247, <br />THIRD SERIES <br /> <br />Edwards stated the matter was tabled in June as a result of input and some edits which they attempted to <br />incorporate into the revised version of the ordinance. He noted he moved the implementation timeline <br />from August to the end of the year in order to get communication out to the residents, along with the <br />remainder of the procurements that are needed and training needed to make the program work. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if Johnson and Edwards had the details regarding the I&I program ironed out to Johnson’s <br />satisfaction. <br /> <br />Johnson said he is in agreement with finding ways to help with the I&I but will vote against the current <br />ordinance because he does not think it is the right vehicle. He said he did not see illicit discharge, such as <br />a broken pipe, in the document. He asked, if an I&I inspection is done and the inspector finds a break <br />where the sewage is discharged, if that falls into another section of the code. <br /> <br />Edwards stated Johnson was right, that illicit discharge falls under the stormwater section of the code. <br /> <br />Johnson said there should be a reference within the ordinance to that because that is another potential <br />consequence that does not fall into the 90-days-to-make -a-repair scenario. He noted Edwards put a great <br />communication plan and timeline in the document. He stated the fourth item in the application talks about <br />a sewer service line, and at the bottom it reads that failures include but are not limited to sags, partially <br />collapsed sections, or tree root intrusion are a pass/fail. <br /> <br />Edwards stated Johnson was correct. <br />Johnson said initially it was just for the I&I but that language addresses some of the performa nce issue of <br />the sewer as well. <br /> <br />Edwards agreed with Johnson and said the application may need to be reworded. He said the intent is, <br />when an I&I sewer service inspection is done, they are looking for I&I, with the exception of an illicit <br />discharge. Otherwise, there are some things which would not be a violation of the I&I code but might be <br />noticed as the pipe is being televised which would be passed on to the homeowner, such as a sag in <br />someone’s line. A sag is not a violation, but it is an area where buildup or clogs can occur. A homeowner
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.