My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2260 Bayview Place - Driveway Issue 2014
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayview Place
>
2260 Bayview Place - 17-117-23-44-0108
>
Correspondence
>
2260 Bayview Place - Driveway Issue 2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:46:07 PM
Creation date
12/17/2021 9:59:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2260
Street Name
Bayview
Street Type
Place
Address
2260 Bayview Place
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
1711723440108
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IvaTUTrS OF TY.E REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br /> NI E I NG HELD ON SEP'IE.MBER 12, 1994 <br /> 3286/3290 NAVARRE LANE- SUBDIVISION <br /> A LOT LINE 11) #1957 JAC RE-skRR NGENLENT-RESOLUTION <br /> OF <br /> request. Segner originally °`�� <br /> Craffron resorted this is a simple lot line rearrangementof lot 44 <br /> lots 44-17 and sold 45, 46, Seo <br /> ler 47 to Bob Marinas. Seer retained ownership <br /> requesting to rearrange the lot line between the two to retain the V2 be ped <br /> nd 100 <br /> and is ireg sites. The SAC charges ft requirement to get two buildable and conforming <br /> g e <br /> There is no water available to this area. A sink driveway will be used for the two lots.Se er, <br /> a <br /> need <br /> The access points for 2250 Bayview Place and 3300 e Navarre <br /> e Lane, <br /> evewae bySngihas <br /> need to be removed fence to eliminate accesstwo <br /> to these homes. <br /> agreed to install <br /> said there is also the issue of five lots #36, 37, 48, 49, and 5ice 0,t owned <br /> erejectdd by <br /> to er, <br /> which applied <br /> which need to be combined to be sold. This was <br /> t those times. This is related to the matter but is not a condition of this <br /> delinquent taxes a <br /> lot line rearrangement. <br /> change to the language in the resolution regardi curhe ors in <br /> g the <br /> Crag;on said there is a minor repeatedly by Y <br /> format of the survey for metes and bounds which is questioned <br /> has separate legal descriptions which is not needed by the county. The <br /> that each parcelPQ, ,Q A city approved <br /> City Attorney requested the following changes <br /> be <br /> tade ineano the other (a deed <br /> C , <br /> conveyance of the residual parcels from one pproperty <br /> ownership and anyasements <br /> and a title opinion on both properties <br /> exchange);ng for erimeter drainage and utility <br /> encumbrances mainly because we are asking P <br /> for this rearrangement. <br /> Scarier replied to Callahan <br /> that she is satisfied with the rearrangement. <br /> Huff stated <br /> the need to add the condition that the five lots be combined at this time. <br /> Jabbour moved to approve Application #1957 subdivision of a lot lire rearrangement <br /> com <br /> l <br /> s <br /> resolution pending.the filing of the application by Jacci Sot on tAyes b'Nav°t� #'6' 37, <br /> 0. <br /> 48, 49, and 50, Resolution X3466. Hurn seconded the m <br /> (#12) SEPTIC 'MORATORIUM UPDATE <br /> requestedGaffrothe input of the Council on the 6-12 month <br /> wee this point, tension of the here are <br /> tic <br /> moratorium <br /> prioritizing of the tasks <br /> moratorium and confirmation and P sewer. <br /> no answers for those needing to either fix their septic or install <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.