Laserfiche WebLink
Item No.: 10 <br />Item Description: Position Reviews and Rescoring <br />Date: November 22, 2021 <br />Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Consent Agenda <br />City Administrator/City Engineer Section: <br />1. Purpose. The purpose of the council item is to gain council approval for the following position <br />description updates and scorings. <br />2. Background. A review of our compensation plan as part of the budgeting process identified some <br />areas of improvement. In particular we identified some positions that have not been incorporated into the <br />city compensation plan and some out dated position descriptions. The process required the supervisor to <br />review and make updates to the job description based on current responsibilities. The job descriptions <br />were then reviewed and scored by the Finance Director and City Administrator. <br />3. Reviews. The following table summarizes the results of the position description reviews and <br />rescoring. <br />Position <br />Justification for Review <br />Description Review Result <br />Score <br />Grade <br />Mike Woken <br />Grade 2, Step 7 <br />Grade 5, Step 1 <br />Current <br />Current <br />Proposed <br />Proposed <br />Custodian/Grounds <br />Barry <br />Not in Pay Scale <br />Community <br />Review Requested by Police Chief <br />The Chief of Police update the CSO <br />76 <br />2(77-89) <br />Service <br />based on compensation discrepancies <br />job description to better describe/ <br />Officer <br />with neighboring departments. <br />align with current duties and <br />118 <br />5(114-127) <br />(CSO) <br />responsibilities. (See Exhibit A) <br />Custodian / <br />The custodian position was created, <br />No changes were made or proposed <br />NA <br />NA <br />Grounds <br />Keeper (Part <br />approved and filled in early 2020. <br />However at that time the position was <br />for the job description. Scoring based <br />on existing description. (See Exhibit <br />93 <br />3(90-103) <br />Time) <br />not incorporated into the City <br />B) <br />Compensation Plan. <br />4. Impact to Current Staff. For the two positions with recommended grade changes the staff will be <br />adjusted to a step in the new grade that that has the closed level of compensation to their current step and <br />they will then be eligible to progress through the remaining steps per the City Personnel Handbook and <br />applicable collective bargaining unit agreements. Changes will not result in reduced compensation for <br />existing employees. <br />Position <br />Employee <br />Current Grade and Step <br />Proposed Grade and Ste <br />Community Service <br />Mike Woken <br />Grade 2, Step 7 <br />Grade 5, Step 1 <br />Officer (CSO) <br />Custodian/Grounds <br />Barry <br />Not in Pay Scale <br />Grade 3, Step 1 <br />Keeper (Part Time) <br />5. Staff Recommendation. I recommend approval of the grade adjustments listed above. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to approve the grade adjustments listed above to be effective January 1, 2022. <br />Exhibits: <br />A. CSO Job Description <br />B. Custodian / Groundskeeper Job Description <br />Prepared By: �y <br />Reviewed By: A. Carlson <br />Approved By: <br />