07-12-2021 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FILE #LA21-42 June 21, 2021 Page 4 of 5 7a Setbacks. Setbacks are 50’ to Wayzata Blvd, 35’ to the rear and the side. Drive lanes 20’ from exterior property lines. The plans reflect a setback of 82 feet from the front property line, 36 feet from the side, and 35 feet from the rear property line. It should be noted that these setbacks are measured from the district boundary, the building itself will be developed on its own lot, established just outside the building footprint. 7b Height, stories, roof style Non-Conforming. The ordinance requires a residential character by incorporating pitched or hipped roof, the proposal is for a flat roof. The Council did not have a concern with the flat roof proposed at sketch plan. As noted above, the height of the building is 30’ 9 inches. The Council may approve a deviation from the height for projects in the RPUD zoning district, but is not obligated to. 7c Outside storage No. None proposed. 11 10% Private Recreational Area (Active and/or Passive) The floor plans show areas labeled “amenity” on the 2nd and 3rd floor, and a 750 sq ft amenity deck on the third floor. 10 percent of the project is 10,800 sq ft. 12 Common Ownership Conforming. Association documents required. 13 Signage Signage located, details not yet developed. 14 Landscaping Landscaping plans provided, appear to be conforming. 15 Architectural Standards Elevations provided. 16 Flexibility from standards Requested: Height. 17 Traffic Studies Not suggested. 18 Building Permits Expected. 19 General regulations applicability Expected. 20 Lighting Lighting plans provided. 21 Trails Sidewalks and public walks proposed. Comprehensive Plan implications. The 48 units on 2.63 acres establishes a density at 18.235 units per acre, below the 20-25 units per acre required for the subject property, requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The Council has authorized the initiation of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to create a new land use category of 15-19.9 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan amendment will be considered at the same time as the Council considers the Final Site and Building Plan, and the Final Plat. Engineer Comments. The city engineer has provided some review comments. They and the applicants response is provided in the attached Exhibit J. Fire Comments. The Fire Department has provided comments, incorporated in the staff comment letter, Exhibit I.