10-11-2021 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FILE #LA21-000060 20 Sept 2021 Page 5 of 5 regarding the use of the property, and the applicant has designed the improvements to improve the use and mitigate any potential nuisances on the property. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; This criterion is met. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; This criterion is met. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; The applicant is advised of this requirement and has provided a lighting plan; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. This condition is met. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Conditional Use Permit Analysis: The applicant has designed the improvements with screening and adjacent properties in mind to avoid negative impacts. Each of the project areas have been designed to conform to the Code requirements. Additionally, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is currently reviewing the project from their rule perspective. The project appears to trigger the District’s erosion control and stormwater rules. The project meets the criteria for the City’s CUP review and will be expected to comply with MCWD permitting rules as well. Public Comments Received public comments are attached as Exhibit G. The applicant’s responses to the comments were incorporated in the project summary description on Page 3. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the request? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the CUP to proceed with the projects as proposed. Compliance with the MCWD’s requirements should be a condition of approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Narrative Exhibit C. Overview Site Map Exhibit D. Maintenance Facility Plans Exhibit E. Wells House Plans Exhibit F. Clubhouse Patio Plans Exhibit G. Public Comment Exhibit H. Property Owners List Exhibit I. Plat Map