Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 20, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />to cut into a rather steep hill to make room and put a significant retaining wall around it. He would prefer <br />not to do that but use what he has submitted in his application. <br /> <br />Kirchner opened the public hearing at 6:17 p.m. <br /> <br />Linda Thrasher, 356 Westlake Street, wants to reaffirm her approval of what Mr. Erickson is suggesting. <br />She is a landowner on the street and has spent a lot of time with Mr. and Mrs. Erickson to understand <br />what they are doing, noting they have been incredibly accommodating. The street could use some help <br />and improvement and the Preliminary Plat works well for Mr. Erickson, but also for the neighbors. It is <br />thoughtful, attractive, and will be an additive to the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Kirchner closed the public hearing at 6:18 p.m. <br /> <br />Libby noted he was in favor of this a year ago when they first reviewed it, he spent a considerable amount <br />of time walking and inspecting the site. He was able to see firsthand how difficult it was for the <br />maintenance truck to pull up to the facility, do the work, and turn around. He thinks the proposal by the <br />Applicant is practical and will improve the safety and practical nature for the City in doing the <br />maintenance there. He supports improvement. <br /> <br />Ressler was in support of the vacation. Regarding the cul-de-sac, the City has seen applications and <br />rigidity in the ability to approve conventional or conforming cul-de-sacs as defined by the City, and a <br />hard line has been taking. Knowing that, he feels that will be the City Council’s belief, as well. He would <br />like to see the 40-foot radius amended because this is the chance to get it right. He respects Mr. <br />Erickson’s desire in keeping it at 40 feet, he also thinks the City Council would probably like to see it <br />conforming. Based on that reason, he would like to see a 50 foot radius on the east and west sides. <br /> <br />Bollis echoed Ressler’s concerns. He thinks it would make more sense to have a conforming cul-de-sac <br />created there and it needs to go farther to the west. He believes the main reason for vacating the roadway <br />was to have a conforming cul-de-sac for benefit to the public. Bollis would like to see it get as close to <br />conforming as possible. <br /> <br />Kirchner agrees regarding the cul-de-sac. He stated regarding the MCWD requirements, it would only be <br />appropriate to include those as this project could take another 1-20 years to complete and regulations may <br />change. <br /> <br />Ressler moved, Libby seconded, to approve LA21-000057, 365 Westlake Street, Preliminary Plat <br />based on the contingencies of Staff recommendations to try and make the 50-foot radius of the cul- <br />de-sac and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. <br /> <br />Barnhart has heard Commissioners talking about shifting the cul-de-sac and clarified Staff’s <br />recommendation is simply to add a 10-foot easement adjacent to parcel 10. He asked if the will of the <br />Commission is rather than acquire that 10-foot easement, to shift it to the west? <br /> <br />Ressler clarified his motion: he is not opposed to either. He feels they have been quite rigid about <br />requirements for cul-de-sacs so however they get there is his motion. <br /> <br />Kirchner agreed; however it gets there to get a conforming cul-de-sac overall. <br />