Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 20, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />1. LA21-000057 BOB ERICKSON, 365 WESTLAKE STREET, PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />Bob Erickson, Applicant, was present. Commissioner Erickson stepped down and excused himself for the <br />item. <br />Staff presented a summary packet of information. Barnhart noted Mr. Erickson is requesting Preliminary <br />Plat approval to plat the vacated portions of Westlake Street and his lot at 365 Westlake. The plat will <br />approve the provision of a drainage and utility easement and additional right-of-way for a cul-de-sac as <br />required by the City Council when they vacated the portion of Westlake. The main issue outstanding is <br />provision of an easement to enlarge the cul-de-sac at 372 Westlake; Staff suggested the portion Mr. <br />Erickson controls on the west side, that the additional easement be provided to make a larger more <br />conforming cul-de-sac. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and notes that this is not a <br />subdivision, they are not creating any more lots, there are no public improvements proposed, and Staff is <br />recommending approval subject to the easement and Watershed District approval. <br />Gettman asked if there was public benefit to doing this other than the access to the easement for public <br />utilities; he thought they had talked about public access. <br />Barnhart replied that was a Staff and Planning Commission recommendation and the City Council did not <br />agree. They found there was adequate benefit to vacation with provision of the cul-de-sac and other <br />concessions Mr. Erickson provided. <br />Bollis asked regarding the cul-de-sac, could they move it over towards the side that is owned and not have <br />an easement on Mr. Erickson’s side. <br />Barnhart replied that would be an option. <br />Bob Erickson, 372 Westlake Street, clarified he has discussed the additional easement for the cul-de-sac <br />with Barnhart and expressed his reservations and since that time his reservations have grown. The 40-foot <br />radius that exists now was determined in 1999 and it was agreed to with the explanation that with a <br />standard 50-foot radius the outside 10 feet is typically used for either snow removal, storage, or parking. <br />Mr. Erickson pointed out on the east side most of it is taken up by his driveway and his neighbor’s <br />driveway. They have done things based on that 1999 approval and have put fencing along the area, <br />planted 3 arborvitae, and have a red maple which would all have to be removed if he gives away the extra <br />10 feet, which he has no plan to do. It is not a part of the application nor is it part of Mr. Erickson’s <br />personal plan. Another thing that seems redundant is the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) <br />approval and he realizes it is standard for a lot of projects. However in looking at Exhibit C in the Staff <br />report, Mr. Erickson initiated contact with the MCWD and explained the project and that he will be <br />removing hardcover near the lake, and the MCWD sent a letter back stating that no permit is required. <br />Bollis asked how Mr. Erickson would feel about adjusting the side he controls so they can get a <br />conforming cul-de-sac in there. <br />Mr. Erickson replied the west side has always been 50 feet and the existing portion in the middle, where <br />the existing street is, is also 50 feet. Combining that with the 40 feet pre-existing, there is a total package <br />that just barely shoehorns in to the flat area. If the whole thing was pushed further west they would have <br />City Council <br />Exhibit B <br />LA21-57