Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 10, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 25 of 34 <br /> <br />16. LA21-000026 – JALIN DESIGN, LLC O/B/O TIM HOLLAND, 1395 ORONO LANE, <br />VARIANCES – RESOLUTION – Continued <br /> <br />the existing building as part of an in-kind replacement and moving it 9 feet further from the lake in order <br />to meet flood plain regulations. It does result in the corners of the new flat roof expanding outward from <br />the sloped portions of the existing roof in the new location and will be 2.5 feet farther from the side lot <br />line (it is currently 2.5 feet and they are proposing 5 feet). The drawings show the existing outline of the <br />boat house as it is today in purple. The footprint is essentially the same configuration, there are three areas <br />where there is a small foundation expansion which is for a shear wall which Curtis believes is an <br />architectural feature. Regarding the carriage house, the applicant is proposing to raise the floor inside the <br />living space as well as the floor inside the garage to allow for some more accessible ceiling dimensions. <br />The footprint is going to stay the same, the location will stay the same, the roof will expand in some <br />places and will lose encroachment in others. Curtis said it is hard to go through it piece-by-piece and the <br />applicant has provided some good exhibits illustrating what they are changing. The applicant is looking <br />for rear and side yard setback variances for the carriage house. The Planning Commission held a public <br />hearing on April 19, 2021 and following the public hearing they voted 5-to-1 in favor of a motion to <br />approve the variances subject to the boat house not having hardcover landings and the property owner <br />signing the standard plumbing covenant. Commissioner Libby was the dissenting voter and did not <br />provide reasoning for his nay vote. No comments were received from neighbors; Staff is recommending <br />approval and a resolution has been drafted for the Council’s consideration. <br /> <br />Jeff Lindgren, 6514 108th Trail, Brooklyn Park, stated this is a fairly substantial project and currently <br />there are three structures on the site and they propose to take down all three because they are not safe and <br />are unlivable. The current owner is looking to build a new home on the site in the future. They are trying <br />to take care of the two smaller structures first as they do not want to cut off access once the new house is <br />up and these two are connected with sewer. Working with Curtis, they found that the current boat house is <br />in the flood plain and they want to be sensitive to those issues and thought it would be best to move that <br />one back and also give more breathing room on the property line for fire code reasons. The footprint <br />stayed the same as for living space – actually it is a bit under – the current architectural features on those <br />walls are from a detail they are trying to get. The current boat house has a good sized overhang around the <br />perimeter; the homeowner would like to build a more contemporary home so they are trying to create <br />these two structures to be congruent with the home. The idea is to have a flat roof on the boat house and <br />to make sure they are meeting energy code they had to raise the hill-height or the wall height around the <br />perimeter given the current structure was hand-framed and had about 4 inches of insulation space. They <br />are trying to find the middle ground by raising the side and lowering the overall height from a viewing <br />standpoint. Regarding the carriage house, it has stayed the same size. The current floor is a bit lower and <br />the back wall is pregnant and is diving in due to water intrusion issues. The thought process is to raise it <br />up to get positive drainage, the current garage doors are at 6.5 feet and they are trying to raise those to a 7 <br />foot height to allow vehicles to enter and enough ceiling height for an operational garage door. They are <br />trying to be cognizant in keeping the roof lower than where it was and using special materials to keep <br />energy efficiency up. Overall they are trying to bring massing down while maintaining a structure that is <br />usable. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if there is a stoop on the drawing.