Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA21-000023 <br />19 April 2021 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br /> <br />Section 78-350 – Garage Setbacks: <br />LR-1C Required Existing Proposed <br />Rear 10’ 11.5’ 10’ <br />West Side 7.5’ 3.6’ 7.5’ garage <br />4’ stair <br />East Side 7.5’ 10.1’ garage <br />6.8’ stair/landing 4.5’ <br /> <br />Section 78-350 – Lot Area/Width: <br />LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ <br />Actual 10,965 s.f. (0.25 acre)* 53’ @ 75’ / 60’ @ OHWL <br />*after subtraction of 966 s.f. blacktop area of Crystal Bay Road <br /> <br />Section 78-1403 – Structural Building Coverage: <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />10,965 s.f. (0.25 acre) Allowed: 2,193 s.f. (20%) <br />Existing: 1,466 s.f. (13.3%) <br />Proposed: 1,548 s.f. (14.1%) <br /> <br />Section 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: <br />Stormwater <br />Overlay District <br />Tier <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Tier 1 10,965 s.f. 2,741 s.f. <br />(25 %) <br />4,134 s.f. <br />(37.7%) <br />4,085 s.f. <br />(37.3%) <br /> <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) <br />The applicant is proposing 37.3% total site hardcover where 25% is permitted; 1,344 square feet <br />more than allowed but a 49 square foot reduction from the existing level. <br /> <br />The garage footprint is proposed to be increased from 20’ x 22’ to 22’ x 24’ to accommodate more <br />reasonably sized vehicles. The 2-car garage is proposed with an 18 foot-wide overhead door. The <br />driveway is 19 feet wide, the minimum required for that door width. The overall hardcover will be <br />reduced by 49 square feet with the removals proposed as part of the project. There are limited <br />parking opportunities due to the property’s location along Crystal Bay Road and with access along <br />the Dakota Trail easement area. <br /> <br />Side Setback Variance (Section 78-350) <br />The proposed garage is shown to conform to the west and rear setbacks. The applicant has received <br />supporting comments from the property owner to the east where the 4.5 foot setback is proposed <br />(Exhibit F). An accessory shed on the property to the east appears to mitigate visual impacts of the <br />reduced setback. The elevation difference from the rear requires that the stairway be replaced. In <br />moving the stair from the east to the west side of the garage, the applicant is able to reduce <br />hardcover for the pathway in addition to removal of the walls which encroach into the Dakota Rail <br />property. Supportive comments have also been received from the neighbor to the west where the