My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 4:35:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 15 <br /> <br />15. SENATOR OSMEK UPDATE – Continued <br /> <br />Crosby said the intersection by Minnetonka Middle School is very dangerous and it is great that Senator <br />Osmek is working on it. <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT (PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE <br />MARK MCCUTCHEON) <br /> <br />16. LA21-000016 – Schimmel Construction o/b/o David & Kathryn Wiemer, 1405 Rest Point Road, <br />Variances <br /> <br />David & Kathryn Wiemer, Applicants, were present. <br /> <br />Barnhart presented a summary packet of information and shared that the Planning Commission <br />recommended denial of the variances. The project includes an addition on to the south side of the <br />property and a deck on the lakeside portion. At the time the Commission reviewed it there was a rear <br />street yard setback, a lake setback (most of the house is in the 0-75), and also a hardcover variance; the <br />Commission did not have a lot of issue for the addition portion of the project but did have concerns with <br />the additional hardcover. Since the Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant has revised their project <br />and removed the need for the hardcover variance. They still need a straight rear yard setback and the lake <br />yard setback. Staff has changed the recommendation for denial to the Planning Commission to an <br />approval of the project based on those changes. <br /> <br />Walsh asked about the other piece getting closer to the lake; he believes it is the stairway. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted the Applicant is proposing some changes to the deck including some flagstone pathways <br />within the 0-75 instead of a structure. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if they are changing existing hardcover. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied they were conforming in hardcover and with the proposed addition they would be above <br />the hardcover limit. Now they have adjusted the drawing so they are at the 25% maximum for hardcover. <br /> <br />Crosby asked how much of the existing hardcover is within the 0-75. <br /> <br />Barnhart pointed it out on screen and said it is somewhat challenging to fit some hardcover without some <br />of it in the 0-75. <br /> <br />Walsh noted that was his concern and he spoke to the Applicant after the last Council meeting and said if <br />they can get it in to the 25% and knowing that the house is within the 0-75 they do not want anything to <br />get any closer than it is today. <br /> <br />Barnhart shared the Applicant reduced the size of the deck proposal 240 square feet to make it fit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.