My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2021
>
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 4:35:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 12 of 15 <br /> <br />LA20-000053 – Dale Richardson o/b/o CBS MN Properties, LLC, 2060 Wayzata Blvd W, Sketch <br />Plan – Continued <br /> <br />Walsh said the developer knows the box to work within and if they massage the box, they can make it <br />work. <br /> <br />Mr. Richardson said it just does not work at the lower unit numbers. <br /> <br />Johnson said that could be and they have not gotten to addressing the setbacks or recreational space. <br /> <br />Mr. Richardson asked even with all the other buildings in the area, such as Stone Bay at 37 feet. He noted <br />they are sitting down in the hole below Sugar Woods and the building to the east is still going to be taller <br />even though they are going up in elevation. He does not think the ask is that extreme. <br /> <br />Walsh summarized that before bringing it to the Planning Commission the developer needs to get down to <br />30 feet or close to it. <br /> <br />Barnhart asked about the support for the flat roof. <br /> <br />The Council would be open to it. <br /> <br />Seals said one thing to keep in mind about Orono is if that lot sits there forever undeveloped, they do not <br />care. <br /> <br />Mr. Richardson just thinks it is a better fit than office condominiums. <br /> <br />Barnhart clarified the setback is only an issue if they are above 30 feet. If they are below, they are okay. <br />Regarding recreational space, he thinks they can get to the 10% with a mixture of uses and amenities. <br />Usually those are anticipated to the target market. He is looking for some more information on the roof <br />top deck. <br /> <br />Crosby asked if they are going for 9 foot ceilings on each story. <br /> <br />Mr. Richardson replied yes. <br /> <br />Walsh said by going with a flat roof that is a bonus as they gain height. <br /> <br />Mr. Richardson asked if they went with a mansard style roof would that allow any more height allowance. <br /> <br />Walsh said no, not based on how they measure it. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted there are specific rules on how they measure height and thinks they will get the most <br />benefit with a flat roof. They can certainly consider both options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.