Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,September 13,2021 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 12. LA21-000050—ALYSSA DWYER&ERIC BIERMANN,2915 CASCO POINT ROAD, <br /> VARIANCES—RESOLUTION NO.7215—Continued <br /> Mayor Walsh said usually they want to make some progress on the 0-75 rather than just meet it. He is <br /> looking to reduce numbers in the 0-75 if they are rebuilding the house. <br /> The City Council discussed and clarified the location of the ALS and 0-75 on screen. <br /> Mayor Walsh noted he was confused by the 0-75 and the ALS line and is now fine with the application. <br /> Printup moved,Seals seconded,to approve LA21-000050—2915 Casco Point Road,Variances— <br /> Resolution No.7215.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 16. LA21-000052—PETIT DESIGN-BARRY PETIT,3355 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, <br /> VARIANCE—RESOLUTION NO.7217 <br /> Staff presented a summary packet of information. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting side yard <br /> setback,hardcover, and 75' lakeshore setback variances to allow for an addition to the existing home. The <br /> addition will include a 2 car garage with living space on the second floor.Also proposed is a new front <br /> walk and driveway within the 0-75 and the applicant has designed the addition to follow the ALS;the lot <br /> is substandard to area width and is currently over in hardcover and building encroachments within the 0- <br /> 75. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval 7-0. <br /> The Council discussed the trail, encroachments,and comments from the Hennepin County Regional Rail <br /> Authority. <br /> Printup moved,Seals seconded,to approve LA21-000052-3355 Crystal Bay Road,Variance— <br /> Resolution No.7217,noting the City Council will not give approval for anything that does not <br /> belong to the City or belongs to the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority.Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> CITY ATTORNEY REPORT <br /> CITY ADMINISTRATOR/ENGINEER REPORT <br /> 17. 2021 ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT—FEE ADJUSTMENT REQUEST—BOLTON <br /> AND MENK <br /> Edwards noted Bolton and Menk has requested a fee adjustment. At the time of awarding the project it <br /> was awarded to Ohman Construction and at the same time Bolton and Menk provided the City with a <br /> construction oversight fee proposal which was a not-to-exceed proposal of$99,000. Mr. Dave Martini is <br /> present tonight to ask for a fee adjustment of$25,000. <br /> Dave Martini noted the Company provides a scope of services to the City and ultimately they approve a <br /> not-to-exceed fee for the work. This typically happens in two stages: for a project like this where there is <br /> design and construction associated,the City approves a fee for the design through bidding portion and a <br /> separate fee at the point of construction.From Bolton and Menk's standpoint,the design piece is <br /> completely in their control.From the construction side, it can be a bit more challenging to estimate fees as <br /> many things are out of their control such as how the contractor approaches the job,the way they stage it, <br /> whether they will be out there performing the work, and access concerns. With this project,they are going <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />