My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EQB & MN Rules
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Sixth Avenue North
>
3960 Sixth Ave N - 29-118-23-33-0009
>
Land Use
>
3960 CR 6 Excel substation
>
Xcel Substation 2011-2012 - File Cabinet 1
>
EQB & MN Rules
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:26:45 PM
Creation date
9/27/2021 11:51:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3960
Street Name
6th
Street Type
Avenue
Street Direction
North
Address
3960 6th Avenue North
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
2911823330009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OAH 8-2500-22429-2 <br /> MPUC E002 /TL-11-223 <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS <br /> FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION <br /> In the Matter of the Route Permit Application for SUMMARY OF <br /> the Orono Substation Replacement and new PUBLIC TESTIMONY <br /> 115 kV Transmission Line Project <br /> This matter came before Administrative Law Judge Eric L. Lipman for a public <br /> hearing on December 15, 2011. The public hearing was held at the City Hall in Orono, <br /> Minnesota and was convened to receive public testimony on a proposed high voltage <br /> transmission line and substation. <br /> Earlier, on June 30, 2011, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC or <br /> Commission) issued an Order accepting the application from Northern States Power, <br /> doing business as Xcel Energy, for a high voltage transmission line Route Permit and <br /> approval of the proposed Orono Substation Replacement.' In this same Order, the <br /> Commission approved the use of an informal review and requested the Office of <br /> Administrative Hearings (OAH) to conduct at least one public hearing on the project.2 <br /> Ten persons attended the public hearings and, of those ten, six provided <br /> testimony during the public hearing.3 Interested persons were recognized for remarks <br /> during which they could submit testimony or make inquiries to the agency and applicant <br /> panelists. In all, the public hearing included two rounds of testimony from interested <br /> members of the public.4 This process continued until no person sought recognition.5 <br /> Following the adjournment of the public hearing, the record remained open for an <br /> additional 22 days within which interested persons were permitted to submit written <br /> comments. During the comment period, the parties to the proceeding, the Department <br /> 1 Order, In the Matter of the Application for a HVTL Route Permit for the Orono Substation Expansion <br /> pP P <br /> and New 115 kV Transmission Line Project, MPUC Docket No. E-002/TL-11-223 (June 30, 2011) (E- <br /> Docket No. 20116-64311-01). <br /> 2 Id. <br /> 3 See, Hearing Roster, OAH 8-2500-22429-2 (E-Docket No. 201112-69736-02). <br /> 4 See, Hearing Transcript, OAH 8-2500-22429-2 at 2 (E-Docket No. 20121-69850-01). <br /> 5 Id, at 57 - 58. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.