EQB & MN Rules - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

locations for the substation." Ms. Fogelberg also stated that the mitigation measures proposed by the Applicants are inadequate to shield a facility of the proposed substation's size and dimension, in the alternative, she urges the Commission to consider the type of shielding methods used for substations in Britain and Japan. 65. Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning for the Three Rivers Park District, testified as to the impacts that one of the transmission line routing alternatives would have to the Baker Regional Park Reserve. The Reserve is a 3,000 acre set of parcels that provide natural habitat, recreation and a trail system in Orono, Minnesota. Ms. Grissman asserted that the proposed routing would not benefit the reserve. Moreover, she argued that because the buffer zones which separate habitat and recreational areas in the reserve from Highway 12, would be narrowed under the routing alternative, that alternative would degrade the Reserve's plans and uses.65 66. Paul Fraser, a resident of the Huntington Farm neighborhood, concurred with Ms. Fogelberg's assessment that more could be done to shield and reduce the visual impacts from an expanded substation. Mr. Fraser argued that because the uses that are adjacent to the substation site are a park reserve and a residential area, more mitigation should be required before any application is approved by the Commission.66 67. Tom Luninski, a resident of Orono, inquired as to whether there would be a change in the capacity of the transmission line as a result of the project. Members of the Applicant panel confirmed that Xcel had no plans to change or upgrade the 0831 transmission line over the course of a 20-year planning period.67 Summary of Written Comments 68. On December 13, 2011, Northern States Power Company submitted the testimony of Joseph Sedarski.68 69. Peter and Carla Schoon, residents of the Huntington Farms neighborhood and members of its neighborhood association, urged selection of a route alternative that runs along the north side of Highway 12. Additionally, the Schoons asserted that not enough effort was being made to minimize visual impacts of the proposed line and substation.69 64 Ex.26 at p. 3 (AU Report) 65 Ibid. 66 Ibid.at pp.3-4 67 Ibid. at p.4 68 Ex. 17(Sedarski Testimony) 69 Ex.26 at p.4(AU Report) 15