EQB & MN Rules - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Assessment prepared by Xcel Energy Public comments on the proposed project were accepted by the ALJ until January 31, 2012.58 60. The public hearing transcript was filed by the Office of Administrative Hearings designated court reporter on January 23, 2012.59 61. During the public hearing, six members of the public presented their views regarding the proposed routing for the project. The ALJ received ten written comments by the January 31, 2012, submittal deadline.60 Staff from the MPCA also submitted comments during the comment period; these comments were inadvertently left out of the ALJ summary report and were filed separately by EFP staff.61 62. The ALJ filed the Summary of Public Testimony on March 5, 2012. The ALJ report contains a summary of oral public comments provided during the hearing and, with the exception of a comment received from the Minnesota Pollution Control agency staff (Finding 61) written comments received by the close of the comment period.62 Summary of Oral Comments 63. Michael and Leena Kallivayalil, residents of the Huntington Farm neighborhood, assert that the Applicant's proposal for substation expansion relies too heavily on the fact that it already owns the underlying property, when, other nearby properties would be better suited to host the larger, upgraded station. Further, the Kallivayalils argue that the shielding techniques proposed by the Applicants are not adequate to address the visual and other impacts from an expanded substation.63 64. Melissa Fogelberg, a resident of the Huntington Farm neighborhood, joins the Kallivayalils in arguing that the substation expansion should not occur at the existing substation site. Specifically, Ms. Fogelberg argues that the applicant's proposal is at odds with both the City of Orono's land use plans as well as the efforts of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to improve the aesthetics of the Highway 12 corridor. Further, she submitted that any uncertainty as to the impacts to human health from electromagnetic field emissions from such facilities should be resolved in favor of homeowners by siting such stations as far away as possible from residential areas. She urges the Commission to withhold approval until the Applicant "has adequately, vigorously and diligently pursued other 58 Ex.26 at p. 3 (AU Report) 59 Ex. 19(Public Hearing Transcript) 60 Ex.26 at pp.4-5(AU Report) 61 Ex.23 (MPCA Comments) 62 Ex.26(AU Report) 63 Ibid.at p. 3 14