My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Environmental Assis for Orono Substation Expansion
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Sixth Avenue North
>
3960 Sixth Ave N - 29-118-23-33-0009
>
Land Use
>
3960 CR 6 Excel substation
>
Xcel 2011 - File Cabinet 1
>
Environmental Assis for Orono Substation Expansion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:26:45 PM
Creation date
9/27/2021 11:25:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3960
Street Name
6th
Street Type
Avenue
Street Direction
North
Address
3960 6th Avenue North
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
2911823330009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In Minnesota, no person may construct a high-voltage transmission line without a route permit from <br />the Public Utilities Commission under Minnesota Statute 216E.03, subdivision 2. A high-voltage <br />transmission line is defined as a conductor of electric energy and associated facilities designed for <br />and capable of operation at a nominal voltage of 100 kV or more and is greater than 1,500 feet in <br />length. Associated facilities of the transmission line include buildings, equipment, and other physical <br />structures that are necessary to the operation of a high-voltage transmission line. <br />2.1 Certificate of Need <br />Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 216B.243, subdivision 2, "No large energy facility shall be sited or <br />constructed in Minnesota without the issuance of a certificate of need by the Commission." In the <br />case of a high-voltage transmission line, a large energy facility is defined as, (1) any high-voltage <br />transmission line with a capacity of 200 kV or more and greater than 1,500 feet in length, and (2) any <br />high-voltage transmission line with a capacity of 100 kV or more with more than ten miles of its <br />length in Minnesota or that crosses a state line. <br />The project as proposed, a 115 kV transmission line with a length of less than one mile, does not <br />qualify as a large energy facility and a certificate of need is not required. <br />2.2 Alternative Permitting Process <br />The proposed project is eligible for consideration under the alternative permitting process <br />(Minnesota Rule 7850.2800) of the Power Plant Siting Act (Minnesota Statute 216E.04). The <br />alternative permitting process is shorter than the full permitting procedures and does not require the <br />applicant to propose alternative sites or routes to the preferred site or route, but does require the <br />applicant to disclose rejected route alternatives and an explanation of why they were rejected. <br />2.3 Route Permit Application <br />The applicant filed a route permit application with the Commission for the Project on June 7, 2011. <br />The Commission accepted the application as complete in an order issued on June 30, 2011. Under <br />the alternative permitting process, the Commission has six months to issue a route permit from the <br />date a route permit application is deemed complete. The Commission may extend this time limit for <br />up to three months for just cause or upon agreement of the applicant. <br />2.4 Public Information and Scoping Meeting <br />EFP staff held a public information and environmental assessment scoping meeting on August 10, <br />2011, at the Orono City Hall in Orono, Minnesota, as required by Minnesota Rule 7850.3500. The <br />meeting provided the public an opportunity to learn about the proposed project and the state's high- <br />voltage transmission line route permitting process, review the applicant's route permit application, <br />ask questions, and submit comments. <br />A court reporter was present at the public meeting and transcribed questions asked and comments <br />made by the public, as well as responses from EFP staff and Xcel Energy (Department of <br />Commerce, 2011a). Approximately seven members of the public attended the meeting. <br />A public comment period, ending on August 26, 2011, also provided the public an opportunity to <br />submit comments on issues and alternative routes for consideration in the scope of the EA. Four <br />Environmental Assessment <br />PUC Docket E002/TL-11-223 Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.