My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Orono_Route_Permit_Application - Docket # W002/TL-11-223
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
6
>
6th Avenue North
>
3960 6th Avenue North - 29-118-23-33-0009
>
Land Use
>
3960 CR 6 Excel substation
>
Xcel 2011 - File Cabinet 1
>
Orono_Route_Permit_Application - Docket # W002/TL-11-223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:26:47 PM
Creation date
9/27/2021 10:59:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3960
Street Name
6th
Street Type
Avenue
Street Direction
North
Address
3960 6th Avenue North
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
2911823330009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
317
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(12. #10-3486 XCEL ENERGY, 3960 SIXTHA VENUE NORTH, Continued) <br />they want anyway. Murphy encouraged the residents to take their comments to the PUC, and suggested <br />that the City work with the citizens as much as possible. <br />Mattick stated the City does have the opportunity to provide comments to the PUC on the application. <br />Michael Kuruvilla stated he would like Xcel to know that the residents are not against Xcel but that this is <br />not a good spot for the substation or the transmission lines. <br />Franchot stated he is in agreement that the City should stand strong with the residents, but that he is <br />unsure whether the City should handle this or turn it over to the PUC. Franchot stated he would like the <br />answer to be that the City can do a better job on this application than the PUC, but that he is not sure <br />whether that is really the case. <br />Franchot moved, McMillan seconded, Application #10-3486, Xcel Energy, 3960 Sixth Avenue <br />North, to accept Staffs recommendation and refer this matter to the Public Utilities Commission. <br />Murphy commented it is likely that Xcel will come in below the maximum decibel level but that it will <br />still seem noisy to the neighbors. Murphy again encouraged the residents to provide their comments to <br />the PUC. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Bremer Opposed. <br />13. #10-3489 SUSAN AND JUSTIN KELLEY AND CLAUDIA AND SCOTT WEISBERG, <br />2980 AND 2990 SUSSEX ROAD — LOT LINE REARRANGEMENTNACATION OF <br />EASEMENT — PUBLIC HEARING — RESOLUTION NO. 6003 <br />Curtis stated the applicants are requesting a lot line rearrangement for the properties located at 2980 and <br />2990 Sussex Road. The applicants would like to move the current lot line 53 feet to the south. Due to an <br />error in publication timing for the vacation of easements, the Planning Commission's public hearing only <br />applied to the lot line rearrangement. The City Council will hold the public hearing for the vacation as <br />well as review the lot line rearrangement. <br />The appropriate utility companies were notified. They have provided comments on the vacation and only <br />one, Xcel Energy, had a line which required a new easement. <br />Mayor White opened the public hearing at 9:50 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Mayor White closed the public hearing at 9:50 p.m. <br />Bremer moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6003, a Resolution Approving a <br />Lot Line Rearrangement and Easement Vacation for Properties Located at 2980 and 2990 Sussex <br />Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Page 19 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.