My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Notice of Xcel Energy Filing Permit Appl
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
S
>
Sixth Avenue North
>
3960 Sixth Ave N - 29-118-23-33-0009
>
Land Use
>
3960 CR 6 Excel substation
>
Xcel 2011 - File Cabinet 1
>
Notice of Xcel Energy Filing Permit Appl
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:26:46 PM
Creation date
9/27/2021 10:44:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3960
Street Name
6th
Street Type
Avenue
Street Direction
North
Address
3960 6th Avenue North
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
2911823330009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I i <br /> This is a photograph of a substation(Bassett Creek)that is similar in size to the proposed <br /> substation.(Note: my car is parked in the far left corner.The substation is so large I was <br /> unable to back up far enough to capture the entire substation in the photograph): <br /> j, �' <br /> it § ! w 9 ' <br /> *$CRdi atx . ea14-4 c19 <br /> r = <br /> • <br /> Likewise,other descriptions and drawings in the EA do not accurately the enormity of the <br /> proposed substation.While these misleading depictions are subtle,it is our belief that they <br /> can have a tremendous influence over a reader. We do not suggest that the bias is purposeful. <br /> More probably,the bias reflects an unconscious belief that the outcome(i.e,approval)of the <br /> application is inevitable,and that Xcel's application will be approved regardless of <br /> homeonwer objections.An assessment that reflects such a bias should be discarded,and a <br /> new non-biased EA that accurately reflects the effects of the proposed project should be <br /> prepared. <br /> • <br /> • The mitigation strategies proposed by Xcel in existing plans and testimony are wholly <br /> inadequate(more 9-9-9?). Among other things: choosing H-frame structure,which have <br /> longer span widths,would have less visual impact on the surroundings. Xcel has described the <br /> steps it will take to maintain the lines after they are constructed(assuming they are approved), <br /> but it has not indicted what steps it would take,either during or after construction,to prevent <br /> and detect invasive species that may be introduced by construction disturbances. Construction <br /> vehicles and equipment should be decontaminated before entering the wetlands. Construction <br /> areas and rights of way should be regularly inspected for invasive species on an ongoing basis. <br /> Rights of way in natural areas should be re-vegetated with DNR-approved seed mixes,both <br /> after initial construction and later as vegetation is removed as part of ongoing maintenance. It <br /> is not sufficient that herbicides be applied following EPA and state agency standards. Any <br /> such herbicides should be appropriate for use in wetlands.The property should not be used by <br /> Xcel as a storage facility,or to park Xcel vehicles. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.